The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An intergroup approach to second language acquisition
Abstract
In this paper, we shall outline a recent social psychological approach to language and ethnicity which attends to the issue: who in an ethnic group uses what language variety, when and why? More specifically, it allows us to understand the processes underlying group members’ desires to attenuate and even create their own distinctive ethnolinguistic varieties (Giles, Bourhis & Taylor, 1977; Giles & Johnson, 1981). It is suggested that this framework is likely to advance our knowledge of factors influencing successful acquisition of a second language. Two current social psychological models of second language acquisition in inter‐ethnic contexts (Gardner, 1979; Clement, 1980a; 1980b) are then compared and evaluated critically. Whilst these models exhibit significant theoretical advances in the area, it is argued that they nonetheless possess certain deficiencies. Prime amongst these concerns is their failure to take into account explicitly processes (such as ethnic identification) which are accorded significance in current intergroup theory (Tajfel, 1974, 1978a; Tajfel & Turner, 1979) and formal status in our own approach to language and ethnicity introduced at the outset of this paper. Finally, an attempt is made to integrate the latter with important aspects of Gardner's and Clement's models culminating in a set of propositions concerned with specifying the social psychological conditions which facilitate or inhibit members of a subordinate ethnic group achieving near native‐like proficiency in the language of a dominant ethnic collectivity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
From acts to dispositions the attribution process in person perception
Jones, E. E., & Davis, K. E. (1965) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60107-0 · Cited by 3,424
Cited by
Social psychology of intergroup relations
Tajfel, H. (1982) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.33.020182.000245 · Cited by 7,949
Noels, K. A. (2001) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/0023-8333.00149 · Cited by 395
Language learning motivation, self and identity: current theoretical perspectives
Ushioda, E. (2011) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2010.538701 · Cited by 348
Intrinsic, Extrinsic, and Integrative Orientations of French Canadian Learners of English
Noels, K., Clément, R., & Pelletier, L. (2001) · The Canadian Modern Language Review · doi:10.3138/cmlr.57.3.424 · Cited by 317
Resisting and Reversing Language Shift: Heritage-Language Resilience among U.S. Native Biliterates
Tse, L. (2001) · Harvard Educational Review · doi:10.17763/haer.71.4.ku752mj536413336 · Cited by 159
Metadata
- Authors
- Giles, H., & Byrne, J. L.
- Venue
- Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1982-01
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 17-40
- ISSN
- 0143-4632 (ISSN-L)
- 1747-7557
- OpenAlex
- W2097609925
- Cited by
- 371
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 74.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.