The framework convention on tobacco control: The politics of global health governance
Abstract
This paper analyses the particular challenges that tobacco control poses for health governance in an era of accelerating globalisation. Traditionally, health systems have been structured at the national level, and health regulation has focused on the needs of populations within individual countries. However, the increasingly global nature of the tobacco industry, and the risks it poses to public health, require a transnational approach to regulation. This has been the rationale behind negotiations for a Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) by the Tobacco Free Initiative of the World Health Organisation (TFI/WHO). In recognition of the need to go beyond national governments, and to create a governance mechanism that can effectively address the transnational nature of the tobacco epidemic, WHO has sought to involve a broad range of interests in negotiations. The contributions of civil society groups in particular in the negotiation process have been unusual. This paper explores the nature and effectiveness of these contributions. It concludes with an assessment of whether the FCTC constitutes a significant shift towards a new form of global health governance, exploring the institutional tensions inherent in attempting to extend participation within a state-centric organisation.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Health groups can use their access to policymakers to strengthen the effectiveness of their advocacy role acting as a public health conscience and expose obstructionist positions by tobacco companies during negotiations.
“In particular, health groups can use their access to policymakers to strengthen the effectiveness of their advocacy role acting as a public health conscience and expose obstructionist positions by tobacco companies during negotiations (Collin, Lee, & Bissell, 2002).”
From Advancing progressive health policy to reduce NCDs amidst international commercial opposition: Tobacco standardised packaging in Australia (2018) · cites this paper as Collin, Lee, & Bissell, 2002
WHO regional and sub-regional FCTC preparatory meetings and inter-session consultations were integral aspects of the formal FCTC negotiation, in which countries could formulate positions on the FCTC.
“Integral aspects of the formal FCTC negotiation were WHO regional and sub-regional FCTC preparatory meetings and inter-session consultations in which countries could formulate positions on the FCTC6, 13.”
From Civil society and the negotiation of the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (2009) · cites this paper as [6]
Although governments negotiated and executed the FCTC, tobacco control civil society organisations played an important role in the FCTC negotiation.
“Although governments negotiated and executed the FCTC, tobacco control civil society organisations played important role in the FCTC negotiation (Collin, Lee et al. 2002; Farquharson 2003; White 2004; Mamudu 2005; Roemer, Taylor et al. 2005).”
From Civil society and the negotiation of the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (2009) · cites this paper as Collin, Lee et al. 2002
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Buse, K., Tanaka, S., & Hawkes, S. (2017) · Globalization and Health · doi:10.1186/s12992-017-0255-3 · Cited by 175 · see citing works
“For example, the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) and its implementation show that it is possible to challenge industry interests and improve global health [40].”
BackgroundCivil society and the negotiation of the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control
Mamudu, H. M., & Glantz, S. A. (2009) · Global Public Health · doi:10.1080/17441690802095355 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
Crosbie, E., Thomson, G., Freeman, B., & Bialous, S. (2018) · Global Public Health · doi:10.1080/17441692.2018.1443485 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
- Authors
- Collin, J., Lee, K., & Bissell, K.
- Venue
- Third World Quarterly
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2002-04
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 265-282
- ISSN
- 0143-6597 (ISSN-L)
- 1360-2241
- OpenAlex
- W2013006068
- Cited by
- 75
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 6.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Third World Quarterly (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Public health and occupational medicine
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › International Environmental Law and Policies
- Keywords
- Framework Convention on Tobacco Control, global health governance, tobacco control, tobacco industry, transnational regulation, World Health Organization, civil society participation, international negotiations, globalization, state-centrism, public health policy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review