The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Turkey and Russia in a shifting global order: cooperation, conflict and asymmetric interdependence in a turbulent region
Abstract
The current global political economy is characterised by the intensifying economic interaction of BRICS and ‘near BRICS’ economies, with emerging powers increasing their influence in neighbouring regions. The growing partnership between Turkey and Russia constitutes a useful case study for examining this transformation, in which Western supremacy and US hegemony are under increasing challenge. Turkish–Russian relations shed light on broader themes in global political economy. First, significant economic interdependence may be generated among states with different political outlooks, in the form of loose regional integration schemes driven by bilateral relations between key states and supporting private actors or interests. Second, growing economic interdependence may coexist with continued political conflict and geopolitical rivalry, as indicated by the Syrian and Ukrainian crises. An important strategy that emerges is the tendency to compartmentalise economic issues and geopolitical rivalries in order to avoid negative spill-over effects. This facilitates the coexistence of extensive competition with deepening cooperation, as reflected in relations in the field of energy.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The determination of the Obama administration to scale down the American presence in the Middle East (by gradually withdrawing US soldiers from Afghanistan and Iraq), and stay away from the internal war in Syria, seems to have motivated Turkey to play a more assertive role in the region.”
From Turkish Foreign Policy in a Changing World Order (2019) · cites this paper as [19]
Citations
Cites
Magnetic Mountain: Stalinism as a Civilization
Kotkin, S., & Richardson, W. (1995) · History Reviews of New Books · doi:10.1080/03612759.1995.9949203 · Cited by 836
Status Seekers: Chinese and Russian Responses to U.S. Primacy
Larson, D. W., & Shevchenko, A. (2010) · International Security · doi:10.1162/isec.2010.34.4.63 · Cited by 545
(2019) · Human Rights Documents online · doi:10.1163/2210-7975_hrd-0128-20180074 · Cited by 470
Cooley, A. A. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199929825.001.0001 · Cited by 358
Rising powers and global governance: negotiating change in a resilient status quo
Kahler, M. (2013) · International Affairs · doi:10.1111/1468-2346.12041 · Cited by 329
Islamism, Democracy and Liberalism in Turkey
Hale, W. M., & Özbudun, E. (2009) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203873359 · Cited by 323
No One's World: The West, the Rising Rest, and the Coming Global Turn
Kupchan, C. A. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199739394.001.0001 · Cited by 317
Fish, M. S. (2005) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511791062 · Cited by 315
Democracy Derailed in Russia: The Failure of Open Politics
Legvold, R., & Fish, M. S. (2006) · Foreign Affairs · doi:10.2307/20031880 · Cited by 270
Between Europeanization and Euro‐Asianism: Foreign Policy Activism in Turkey during the AKP Era
Öniş, Z., & Yılmaz, Ş. (2009) · Turkish Studies · doi:10.1080/14683840802648562 · Cited by 237
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 25
- Aktürk Şener, 2014, Insight Turkey, 16, 13
- Altun Mehmet, 2009, Dış Dünyanın Anahtarı DEİK: Dış Ekonomik İlişkiler Kuruluşu’nun İlk Yılları [DEIK Key to the Outer World: First Years of the Foreign Economic Relations Board]
- “Ankara says Turkish Stream not just transit Project.” World Bulletin , December 11, 2014. http://www.worldbulletin.net/news/150464/ankara-says-turkish-stream-not-just-transit-project.
- Aras Bülent, 2010, Dealing with Russia: A Turkish Perspective
- Baev Pavel K., 2013, Russia and Turkey in Conflict (Mis)management in the Caucasus
- Bayer Reşat, 2013, Turkey and Human Security, 183
- Bourgeot Remi, 2013, Russie.NEI.Visions
- Jongryn Mo, 2015, MIKTA, Middle Powers and the New Dynamics of Global Governance, 10.1057/9781137506467 · DOI
- Kanbolat Hasan, 2012, Today’s Zaman
- Kılavuz M. Tahir, 2012, Restoring Brotherly Bonds: Turkish–Azeri Energy Relations
- Levine M., 1976, Social History, 1, 139
- Öniş Ziya, 2013, Insight Turkey, 15, 103
- Özdal Habibe, 2013, Türkiye–Rusya İlişkileri: Rekabetten Çok Yönlü İşbirliğine
- Özel Soli, Turkish–American Relations for a New Era: A Turkish Perspective
- Peker Emre, 2014, Wall Street Journal
- Primakov Y. M., 2012, Typция: нoвaяpoль в coвpeмeннoммиpe
- Hürriyet
- Hürriyet
- Soysal İsmail, 1989, Türkiye’nin Siyasal Anlaşmaları, 1, 19
- Trenin Dmitri, 2013, Insight Turkey, 15, 37
- TÜİK (Turkish Statistical Institute), 2015, Turkish–Russian trade volume and trade deficit
- Turkish Energy Strategy in the, 2013, 21st Century: Weathering Uncertainties and Discontinuities
- Türker Ahmet Tolga, 2012, ISZU Journal of Social Sciences, 1, 46
- Ülgen S., 2011, Nükleer Enerjiye Geçişte Türkiye Modeli
- Yanık Lerna, 2007, East European Quarterly, 41, 349
Cited by
Turkish Foreign Policy in a Changing World Order
OĞUZLU, H. T. (2019) · All Azimuth: A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace · doi:10.20991/allazimuth.464076 · Cited by 49
Metadata
- Authors
- Öniş, Z., & Yılmaz, Ş.
- Affiliations
- Koç University (TR)
- Corresponding author
- Öniş, Ziya
- Venue
- Third World Quarterly
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2015-11-30
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 71-95
- ISSN
- 0143-6597 (ISSN-L)
- 1360-2241
- OpenAlex
- W2189701241
- Cited by
- 117
- References
- 50
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2
- FWCI
- 45.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Third World Quarterly (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Global Political and Economic Relations
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › International Relations and Foreign Policy
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Balkan and Eastern European Studies
- Keywords
- Turkey–Russia relations, asymmetric interdependence, economic interdependence, geopolitical competition, BRICS, emerging powers, regional integration, energy cooperation, Syrian crisis, Ukraine crisis, US hegemony, international political economy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.