Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 117Global Political and Economic RelationsInternational Relations and Foreign PolicyBalkan and Eastern European Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Turkey and Russia in a shifting global order: cooperation, conflict and asymmetric interdependence in a turbulent region

Öniş, Ziya, Yılmaz, Şuhnaz·2016·Third World Quarterly
DOI 10.1080/01436597.2015.1086638
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The current global political economy is characterised by the intensifying economic interaction of BRICS and ‘near BRICS’ economies, with emerging powers increasing their influence in neighbouring regions. The growing partnership between Turkey and Russia constitutes a useful case study for examining this transformation, in which Western supremacy and US hegemony are under increasing challenge. Turkish–Russian relations shed light on broader themes in global political economy. First, significant economic interdependence may be generated among states with different political outlooks, in the form of loose regional integration schemes driven by bilateral relations between key states and supporting private actors or interests. Second, growing economic interdependence may coexist with continued political conflict and geopolitical rivalry, as indicated by the Syrian and Ukrainian crises. An important strategy that emerges is the tendency to compartmentalise economic issues and geopolitical rivalries in order to avoid negative spill-over effects. This facilitates the coexistence of extensive competition with deepening cooperation, as reflected in relations in the field of energy.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/01436597.2015.1086638

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 50 references

Research works printed but not linked: 25

  1. Aktürk Şener, 2014, Insight Turkey, 16, 13
  2. Altun Mehmet, 2009, Dış Dünyanın Anahtarı DEİK: Dış Ekonomik İlişkiler Kuruluşu’nun İlk Yılları [DEIK Key to the Outer World: First Years of the Foreign Economic Relations Board]
  3. “Ankara says Turkish Stream not just transit Project.” World Bulletin , December 11, 2014. http://www.worldbulletin.net/news/150464/ankara-says-turkish-stream-not-just-transit-project.
  4. Aras Bülent, 2010, Dealing with Russia: A Turkish Perspective
  5. Baev Pavel K., 2013, Russia and Turkey in Conflict (Mis)management in the Caucasus
  6. Bayer Reşat, 2013, Turkey and Human Security, 183
  7. Bourgeot Remi, 2013, Russie.NEI.Visions
  8. Jongryn Mo, 2015, MIKTA, Middle Powers and the New Dynamics of Global Governance, 10.1057/9781137506467 · DOI
  9. Kanbolat Hasan, 2012, Today’s Zaman
  10. Kılavuz M. Tahir, 2012, Restoring Brotherly Bonds: Turkish–Azeri Energy Relations
  11. Levine M., 1976, Social History, 1, 139
  12. Öniş Ziya, 2013, Insight Turkey, 15, 103
  13. Özdal Habibe, 2013, Türkiye–Rusya İlişkileri: Rekabetten Çok Yönlü İşbirliğine
  14. Özel Soli, Turkish–American Relations for a New Era: A Turkish Perspective
  15. Peker Emre, 2014, Wall Street Journal
  16. Primakov Y. M., 2012, Typция: нoвaяpoль в coвpeмeннoммиpe
  17. Hürriyet
  18. Hürriyet
  19. Soysal İsmail, 1989, Türkiye’nin Siyasal Anlaşmaları, 1, 19
  20. Trenin Dmitri, 2013, Insight Turkey, 15, 37
  21. TÜİK (Turkish Statistical Institute), 2015, Turkish–Russian trade volume and trade deficit
  22. Turkish Energy Strategy in the, 2013, 21st Century: Weathering Uncertainties and Discontinuities
  23. Türker Ahmet Tolga, 2012, ISZU Journal of Social Sciences, 1, 46
  24. Ülgen S., 2011, Nükleer Enerjiye Geçişte Türkiye Modeli
  25. Yanık Lerna, 2007, East European Quarterly, 41, 349

Cited by

See all 117

Related

Metadata

Authors
Öniş, Z., & Yılmaz, Ş.
Affiliations
Koç University (TR)
Corresponding author
Öniş, Ziya
ORCID
Venue
Third World Quarterly
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2015-11-30
Volume
37
Issue
1
Pages
71-95
ISSN
  • 0143-6597 (ISSN-L)
  • 1360-2241
DOI
10.1080/01436597.2015.1086638
OpenAlex
W2189701241
Cited by
117
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2
FWCI
45.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Third World Quarterly (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Global Political and Economic Relations
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › International Relations and Foreign Policy
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Balkan and Eastern European Studies
Keywords
Turkey–Russia relations, asymmetric interdependence, economic interdependence, geopolitical competition, BRICS, emerging powers, regional integration, energy cooperation, Syrian crisis, Ukraine crisis, US hegemony, international political economy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.