Cited by 66Teacher Education and Leadership StudiesTeacher Professional Development and MotivationStress and Burnout Research

Influencing the psychological well-being of beginning teachers across three years of teaching: self-efficacy, stress causes, job tension and job discontent.

Open access
Helms-Lorenz, Michelle, Maulana, Ridwan·2016·Educational Psychology

Abstract

In this study, the path of influence of support programmes for beginning teachers (BTs) is examined. Longitudinal relationships between self-efficacy and stress causes experienced by BTs and their job tension and discontent are investigated. Differential effects are explored in the relationships between the perceived psychological variables for induction and non-induction groups, after a period of three years. A total of 62 secondary schools and 338 BTs, in the Netherlands, were randomly selected to two context conditions. In the experimental condition, an induction arrangement was provided to the BTs. The remaining schools and BTs followed their regular (induction) arrangements. Results show that school and class efficacy are negatively related to job tension and job discontent. Stress causes were positively related to job tension and discontent. The link between classroom self-efficacy and stress outcomes is much stronger in the induction group. For school self-efficacy, however, the link is weaker in the induction groups. Implications of the findings for practice and theory are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/01443410.2015.1008403

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Higher levels of efficacy conceptions in educators have an essential function in enhancing educators' well-being.

    “higher levels of efficacy conceptions in educators have an essential function in enhancing their educators’ well-being (Helms-Lorenz and Maulana, 2016).”

    From Teachers' Commitment and Self-Efficacy as Predictors of Work Engagement and Well-Being (2022) · cites this paper as Helms-Lorenz and Maulana, 2016

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Helms-Lorenz, M., & Maulana, R.
Affiliations
University of Groningen (NL)
Corresponding author
Maulana, Ridwan
Venue
Educational Psychology
Published
2015-02-06
Volume
36
Issue
3
Pages
569-594
ISSN
  • 0144-3410 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-5820
OpenAlex
W2038905030
Cited by
66
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1
FWCI
21.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Educational Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Professional Development and Motivation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
Keywords
novice teachers, teacher induction, teacher self-efficacy, teacher stress, occupational stress, teacher well-being, secondary school teachers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review