The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bullying and victimisation rates among students in general and special education: a comparative analysis
Abstract
Bullying and victimisation remains a pervasive problem within the nation’s schools. International research has indicated that students who are enrolled in special education curricula are victimised and perpetrate more bullying than their general education peers. Few empirical studies have examined bullying and victimisation rates among American schoolchildren within special education programmes. The current study examined rates of bullying and fighting perpetration and victimisation among middle‐school students (n = 7331) and high‐school students (n = 14,315) enrolled in general education and special education programmes. As hypothesised, students in special education reported greater rates of bullying and fighting perpetration, and victimisation than general education students. Students who were in self‐contained classrooms reported more perpetration and victimisation than those in inclusive settings. Fighting perpetration was similar for younger and older students in special education settings, whereas fighting perpetration was lower for older students, versus younger students, in general education.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Olweus, D. (1994) · The Plenum Series in Social/Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-9116-7_5 · Cited by 1,890
Bullying, Victimization, and Sexual Harassment During the Transition to Middle School
Pellegrini, A. D. (2002) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1207/s15326985ep3703_2 · Cited by 390
Fleming, C. B., Haggerty, K. P., Catalano, R. F., Harachi, T. W., Mazza, J. J., & Gruman, D. H. (2005) · Journal of School Health · doi:10.1111/j.1746-1561.2005.00048.x · Cited by 136
Cited by
Adolescent Health and Harassment Based on Discriminatory Bias
Russell, S. T., Sinclair, K. O., Poteat, V. P., & Koenig, B. W. (2012) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.2011.300430 · Cited by 395
Blake, J. J., Lund, E. M., Zhou, Q., Kwok, O.-M., & Benz, M. R. (2012) · School Psychology Quarterly · doi:10.1037/spq0000008 · Cited by 329
Bullying of children and adolescents with autism spectrum conditions: a ‘state of the field’ review
Humphrey, N., & Hebron, J. (2015) · International Journal of Inclusive Education · doi:10.1080/13603116.2014.981602 · Cited by 272
Sterzing, P. R., Shattuck, P. T., Narendorf, S. C., Wagner, M., & Cooper, B. P. (2012) · Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine · doi:10.1001/archpediatrics.2012.790 · Cited by 254
Victimization of students with autism spectrum disorder: a review of prevalence and risk factors
Sreckovic, M. A., Brunsting, N. C., & Able, H. (2014) · Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.rasd.2014.06.004 · Cited by 140
Metadata
- Authors
- Rose, C. A., Espelage, D. L., & Monda‐Amaya, L. E.
- Venue
- Educational Psychology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2009-10-06
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 761-776
- ISSN
- 0144-3410 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-5820
- OpenAlex
- W2138315938
- Cited by
- 158
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 8.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bullying and victimisation rates among students in general and special education: a comparative analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/01443410903254864
- The paper
- Rose, C. A., Espelage, D. L., & Monda‐Amaya, L. E. (2009). Bullying and victimisation rates among students in general and special education: a comparative analysis. Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410903254864
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
