The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Conceptualizing stakeholder engagement in the context of sustainability and its assessment
Open accessAbstract
Stakeholder engagement in construction projects can be conceptualized in different ways. It can be seen from a strategic management perspective aimed at capturing knowledge, increasing ownership of the project by users, reducing conflict, encouraging innovation and facilitating spin‐off partnerships. From an ethical perspective, meaningful stakeholder engagement can be seen to enhance inclusive decision making, promote equity, enhance local decision making and build social capital. The benefits from both of these perspectives are vital for sustainability; however, stakeholder engagement can also be seen from the perspective of an opportunity for social learning—a social process where diverse stakeholders share a common forum, learn about each other's values, reflect upon their own values and create a shared vision and shared objectives. Dialogue is also useful in increasing awareness, changing attitudes and affecting behaviours. Existing practices view stakeholder engagement: mostly from a management perspective; sometimes from an ethical perspective; less often as a combination of the two; and rarely have any element of the social learning perspective. There is a need for an approach that combines all the three perspectives if sustainability is to be pursued. A dialogue‐oriented approach to integrated sustainability assessment could provide an ideal means to do so.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
What to do when Stakeholders matter: Stakeholder Identification and Analysis Techniques
Bryson, J. M. (2004) · Public Management Review · doi:10.1080/14719030410001675722 · Cited by 1,426
Cited by
A Systemic Framework for Sustainability Assessment
Sala, S., Ciuffo, B., & Nijkamp, P. (2015) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.09.015 · Cited by 743
Business cases for sustainability: a stakeholder theory perspective
Schaltegger, S., Hörisch, J., & Freeman, R. E. (2019) · Organization & Environment · doi:10.1177/1086026617722882 · Cited by 477
Martens, M. L., & Carvalho, M. M. (2017) · International Journal of Project Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.04.004 · Cited by 459
Project benefits co-creation: shaping sustainable development benefits
Keeys, L. A., & Huemann, M. (2017) · International Journal of Project Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.02.008 · Cited by 148
(2014) · QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology) · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Mathur, V. N., Price, A. D. F., & Austin, S.
- Venue
- Construction Management and Economics
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2008-06
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 601-609
- ISSN
- 0144-6193 (ISSN-L)
- 1466-433X
- OpenAlex
- W1980964701
- Cited by
- 285
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Conceptualizing stakeholder engagement in the context of sustainability and its assessment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/01446190802061233
- The paper
- Mathur, V. N., Price, A. D. F., & Austin, S. (2008). Conceptualizing stakeholder engagement in the context of sustainability and its assessment. Construction Management and Economics. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190802061233
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.