The DOI matches its Crossref record; 77 of the 77 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Key factors of sustainability in project management context: A survey exploring the project managers' perspective
Open accessAbstract
Topics of project management and sustainability have been addressed by countless studies, but research focusing on the intersection of these topics are needed. This research looks at sustainability through the triple-bottom line perspective: economic, social, and environmental. It aims to identify key aspects of sustainability in project management context and to understand its importance based on project managers' lens. A systematic literature review merging bibliometric and content analysis was applied toward an understanding of the key topics. Further, a survey of project managers was performed and analyzed through exploratory factor analysis. The results show that four factors stood out: Sustainable Innovation Business Model, Stakeholders Management, Economic and Competitive Advantage, and Environmental Policies and Resources Saving.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
Muller, K. (1989) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.1989.10488618 · Cited by 99,167
Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences
(1990) · Computers, Environment and Urban Systems · doi:10.1016/0198-9715(90)90050-4 · Cited by 65,269
Statistical power analyses using G∗Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A.-G. (2009) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/brm.41.4.1149 · Cited by 37,615
Herne, H., Cooley, W. W., & Lohnes, P. R. (1973) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General) · doi:10.2307/2344428 · Cited by 35,697
Qu, X. (2007) · Technometrics · doi:10.1198/tech.2007.s455 · Cited by 14,705
Brundtland, G. H. (1991) · Earth and Us · doi:10.1016/b978-0-7506-1049-0.50009-5 · Cited by 12,174
Cannibals with forks: the triple bottom line of 21st century business
(1999) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.36-3997 · Cited by 9,014
A Natural-Resource-Based View of the Firm
Hart, S. L. (1995) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1995.9512280033 · Cited by 5,174
Green and competitive: ending the stalemate
(1995) · Long Range Planning · doi:10.1016/0024-6301(95)99997-e · Cited by 3,848
Shifting Paradigms for Sustainable Development: Implications for Management Theory and Research
Gladwin, T. N., Kennelly, J. J., & Krause, T. (1995) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1995.9512280024 · Cited by 2,413
Cited by
Sustainability as a new school of thought in project management
Silvius, G. (2017) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.121 · Cited by 196
Hosseini, M. R., Banihashemi, S., Rameezdeen, R., Golizadeh, H., Arashpour, M., & Ma, L. (2017) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.200 · Cited by 48
Gibbin, R. V., Sigahi, T. F. A. C., Pinto, J. D. S., Rampasso, I. S., & Anholon, R. (2023) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137753 · Cited by 38
de Almeida Vittori Ferreira, M., Morgado, C. D. R. V., & Estellita Lins, M. P. (2024) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23762 · Cited by 25
Rokio, M., Ahola, T., Alkki, L., & Ståhle, M. (2024) · International Journal of Project Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2024.102647 · Cited by 21
Metadata
- Authors
- Martens, M. L., & Carvalho, M. M.
- Venue
- International Journal of Project Management
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-08
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1084-1102
- ISSN
- 0263-7863 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2385738639
- Cited by
- 459
- References
- 77
- FWCI
- 42.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Key factors of sustainability in project management context: A survey exploring the project managers' perspective. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.04.004
- The paper
- Martens, M. L., & Carvalho, M. M. (2017). Key factors of sustainability in project management context: A survey exploring the project managers' perspective. International Journal of Project Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.04.004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
