The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Construction safety training using immersive virtual reality
Abstract
Construction workers’ ability to identify and assess risks is acquired through training and experience and is among the key factors that determine their behaviour and thus their safety. Yet researchers have questioned the effectiveness of conventional safety training. This research tested the hypotheses that safety training in a virtual reality (VR) construction site would be feasible and more effective, in terms of workers’ learning and recall in identifying and assessing construction safety risks, than would equivalent training using conventional methods. Sixty-six subjects were provided training in construction safety and their safety knowledge was tested prior to the training, immediately afterward, and one month later. Half of the subjects received traditional classroom training with visual aids; the other half were trained using a 3D immersive VR power-wall. Significant advantage was found for VR training for stone cladding work and for cast-in-situ concrete work, but not for general site safety. VR training was more effective in terms of maintaining trainees’ attention and concentration. Training with VR was more effective over time, especially in the context of cast-in-situ concrete works. Given the need for improved training and the advantages of training using VR, incorporation of VR in construction safety training is strongly recommended.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
From presence to consciousness through virtual reality.
Sanchez-Vives, M. V., & Slater, M. (2005) · Nature reviews. Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1651 · Cited by 1,831
Cited by
Makransky, G., Borre‐Gude, S., & Mayer, R. E. (2019) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.12375 · Cited by 532
A research agenda for augmented and virtual reality in architecture, engineering and construction
Davila Delgado, J. M., Oyedele, L., Demian, P., & Beach, T. (2020) · Advanced Engineering Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.aei.2020.101122 · Cited by 486
Virtual reality applications for the built environment: Research trends and opportunities
Zhang, Y., Liu, H., Kang, S.-C., & Al-Hussein, M. (2020) · Automation in Construction · doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103311 · Cited by 361
Computer vision for behaviour-based safety in construction: A review and future directions
Fang, W., Love, P. E. D., Luo, H., & Ding, L. (2020) · Advanced Engineering Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.aei.2019.100980 · Cited by 346
Using Game-Based Virtual Reality with Haptics for Skill Acquisition
Butt, A. L., Kardong-Edgren, S., & Ellertson, A. (2018) · Clinical Simulation in Nursing · doi:10.1016/j.ecns.2017.09.010 · Cited by 282
Metadata
- Authors
- Sacks, R., Perlman, A., & Barak, R.
- Venue
- Construction Management and Economics
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2013-09
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1005-1017
- ISSN
- 0144-6193 (ISSN-L)
- 1466-433X
- OpenAlex
- W1976408896
- Cited by
- 666
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Construction safety training using immersive virtual reality. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/01446193.2013.828844
- The paper
- Sacks, R., Perlman, A., & Barak, R. (2013). Construction safety training using immersive virtual reality. Construction Management and Economics. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2013.828844
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.