CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 111Technology Adoption and User BehaviourGlobal and Cross-Cultural ManagementDecision Support System Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Impact of national culture on information technology usage behaviour: An exploratory study of decision making in Korea and the USA

Calhoun, Kenneth J., Teng, James T. C., Cheon, Myun Joong·2002·Behaviour & Information Technology
DOI 10.1080/0144929021000013491
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The globalization of world markets has led to the introduction of information technology, most often developed in western cultures, to other societies. Cultural values were embedded in the design and use of these technologies. Often, the receiving society did not embrace the technology because of culture. Examples of such behaviour include executive information systems and group decision support systems, which are cited later. This study examines the use of non-specific applications of information technology for organizational decision making. A survey instrument was developed to measure decision makers' perceptions of the impact of information technology on the decision process. Decision makers in Korea and the USA indicated their perceptions of the extent information technology use impacted their decision making activities. The results indicated some behaviours appeared to change to take advantage of the technology, while others, particularly those associated with the cultural preference for communication, did not.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/0144929021000013491

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 43

  1. ADLER N., 1983, Academy of Management Review., 8, 226
  2. ALAVI M., 1993, Information and Management., 25, 175, 10.1016/0378-7206(93)90066-3 · DOI
  3. APPLEGATE L., 1991, Journal of Organizational Computing., 1, 1, 10.1080/10919399109540147 · DOI
  4. BALIGH H., 1994, Management Science., 40, 14, 10.1287/mnsc.40.1.14 · DOI
  5. BELCHER L., 1993, M/S Quarterly., 17, 239
  6. CHENEY P., 1982, Academy of Management Review., 25, 170, 10.2307/256032 · DOI
  7. CHURCHILL G., 1979, Journal of Marketing Research., 16, 64, 10.2307/3150876 · DOI · Paper page
  8. DAVIS F., 1994, Decision Sciences., 25, 57, 10.1111/j.1540-5915.1994.tb00516.x · DOI
  9. DENNIS A., 1991, Journal of Management Information Systems., 7, 107, 10.1080/07421222.1990.11517899 · DOI
  10. DICKSON G., 1977, Management Science., 23, 913, 10.1287/mnsc.23.9.913 · DOI
  11. FOSTER L., 1984, MIS Quarterly., 8, 229, 10.2307/249093 · DOI
  12. FRIED L., 1993, Journal of Information Systems Management., 10, 7, 10.1080/10580539308906922 · DOI
  13. GESSNER S., 1994, Planning Review, 22, 34, 10.1108/eb054453 · DOI
  14. HACKMAN J., 1980, Work Redesign
  15. HALL E. T., 1976, Beyond Culture
  16. HO, T., RAMAN, K. and WATSON, R. Group decision support systems: the cultural factor. Proceedings of the Tenth Annual International Conference on Information Systems. Boston. pp.119–129. · DOI
  17. HOFSTEDE G., 1991, Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind
  18. HOFSTEDE G., 1988, Oganizational Dynamics., 16, 4
  19. HOHN S., 1986, Long Range Planning., 19, 18, 10.1016/0024-6301(86)90266-9 · DOI
  20. HUBER G., 1990, Academy of Management Review., 15, 47, 10.5465/amr.1990.4308227 · DOI
  21. KASPER G., 1985, Journal of Management Information Systems., 2, 26, 10.1080/07399018508967766 · DOI
  22. KIM K., 1990, Academy of Management Journal., 188, 10.2307/256358 · DOI
  23. KUMAR K., 1990, Communications of the ACM., 35, 528, 10.1145/78607.78613 · DOI
  24. LEAVITT H., 1958, Harvard Business Review., 36, 41
  25. LEIDNER D., 1995, Organization Science., 6, 645, 10.1287/orsc.6.6.645 · DOI
  26. LEIDNER D., 1999, Decision Sciences., 30, 633, 10.1111/j.1540-5915.1999.tb00901.x · DOI
  27. MILLMAN Z., 1987, M/S Quarterly, 11, 107
  28. NUNNALY J., 1967, Psychometric Theory
  29. PELTON J., 1993, Telecommunications, 27, 7
  30. RHYNE L., 1985, Strategic Management Journal., 6, 319, 10.1002/smj.4250060403 · DOI
  31. ROCKART J., 1989, Sloan Management Review., 10, 7
  32. SANDERS G., 1985, MIS Quarterly, 9, 77, 10.2307/249275 · DOI
  33. SANDERS G., 1984, Information and Management, 7, 141, 10.1016/0378-7206(84)90042-9 · DOI
  34. SIMON H., 1977, The new science of management decision,
  35. SIMON H., 1990, The Accounting Review, 65, 658
  36. STEVENS I., 1990, Computerworld
  37. STRUAB D., 1994, Information Systems Research, 5, 23, 10.1287/isre.5.1.23 · DOI
  38. TENG J., 1996, Decision Sciences, 27, 673, 10.1111/j.1540-5915.1996.tb01831.x · DOI
  39. THOMPSON R., 1991, MIS Quarterly., 15, 125, 10.2307/249443 · DOI · Paper page
  40. TROMPENAARS F., 1998, Riding the Waves of Culture.
  41. WATSON H., 1991, MIS Quarterly, 15, 13, 10.2307/249431 · DOI
  42. WEIZER N., 1992, Chief information Officer., 4, 41
  43. YOO S., 1987, Long Range Planning, 20, 114, 10.1016/0024-6301(87)90013-6 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Calhoun, K. J., Teng, J. T. C., & Cheon, M. J.
Affiliations
  • Slippery Rock University (US)
  • The University of Texas at Arlington (US)
  • University of Ulsan (KR)
Venue
Behaviour & Information Technology
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2002-01
Volume
21
Issue
4
Pages
293-302
ISSN
  • 0144-929X (ISSN-L)
  • 1362-3001
DOI
10.1080/0144929021000013491
OpenAlex
W1966814010
Cited by
111
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 5
FWCI
5.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Behaviour and Information Technology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Business and International Management › Global and Cross-Cultural Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Decision Support System Applications
Keywords
national culture, organizational decision-making, cultural values, technology adoption, cross-cultural comparison, Korea, United States, executive information systems, group decision support systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review