The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Do older adults underestimate their actual computer knowledge?
Abstract
This work examined the hypothesis that elderly people are less confident than young people in their own computer knowledge. This was done by having 49 young (M = 22.6 years) and 42 older (M = 68.6 years) participants to assess their global self-efficacy beliefs and to make item-by-item prospective (feeling-of-knowing: FOK) and retrospective (confidence level: CL) judgments about their knowledge in the two domains of computers and general knowledge. The latter served as a control domain. Item difficulty was equated across age groups in each domain. In spite of this age equivalence in actual performance, differences were found in FOK and CL ratings for computers but not for general knowledge, with older people being less confident than young people in their own computer knowledge. The greater age difference in ratings observed in the computer domain, as compared with the general domain, was even greater for the FOK than for the CL judgments. Statistical control of age differences in global self-efficacy beliefs in the computer domain (poorer in the older participants, but not in the general domain), eliminated age differences in FOK and CL judgments in the same domain. These findings confirm earlier ones. They suggest that underconfidence in their relevant abilities is one possible source of the difficulties that the elderly may encounter in mastering new computer technologies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Decision making: A psychological analysis of conflict, choice, and commitment
(1978) · Evaluation and Program Planning · doi:10.1016/0149-7189(78)90042-3 · Cited by 3,946
A comparison of current measures of the accuracy of feeling-of-knowing predictions
Nelson, T. O. (1984) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.95.1.109 · Cited by 976
Advances in Motivation and Achievement
(2014) · Advances in motivation and achievement · doi:10.1108/ama · Cited by 324
The Metamemory in Adulthood (MIA) questionnaire.
Dixon, R. A., Hultsch, D. F., & Hertzog, C. K. (1988) · PubMed · Cited by 302
Sources of information in metamemory: Judgments of learning and feelings of knowing
Schwartz, B. L. (1994) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/bf03213977 · Cited by 251
Influence of Direct Computer Experience on Older Adults' Attitudes Toward Computers
Jay, G. M., & Willis, S. L. (1992) · Journal of Gerontology · doi:10.1093/geronj/47.4.p250 · Cited by 230
Issues in training older adults to use computers
KELLEY, C. L., & CHARNESS, N. (1995) · Behaviour & Information Technology · doi:10.1080/01449299508914630 · Cited by 223
Machine pacing and occupational stress
(1982) · Applied Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/0003-6870(82)90232-0 · Cited by 177
Confidence level and feeling of knowing in question answering: The weight of inferential processes.
Costermans, J., Lories, G., & Ansay, C. (1992) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition · doi:10.1037//0278-7393.18.1.142 · Cited by 168
Evidence for the convergent validity of two self-report metamemory questionnaires.
Hertzog, C. K., Hultsch, D. F., & Dixon, R. A. (1989) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/0012-1649.25.5.687 · Cited by 154
Cited by
Computer use by older adults: A multi-disciplinary review
Wagner, N., Hassanein, K., & Head, M. (2010) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.03.029 · Cited by 678
From internet access to internet skills: digital inequality among older adults
Hargittai, E., Piper, A. M., & Morris, M. R. (2019) · Universal Access in the Information Society · doi:10.1007/s10209-018-0617-5 · Cited by 616
Barnard, Y., Bradley, M. D., Hodgson, F., & Lloyd, A. D. (2013) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.02.006 · Cited by 597
The impact of aging on access to technology
Czaja, S. J., & Lee, C. C. (2007) · Universal Access in the Information Society · doi:10.1007/s10209-006-0060-x · Cited by 560
Digital game design for elderly users
Ijsselsteijn, W., Nap, H. H., de Kort, Y., & Poels, K. (2007) · Proceedings of the 2007 conference on Future Play - Future Play '07 · doi:10.1145/1328202.1328206 · Cited by 532
Metadata
- Authors
- Marquié, J. C., Jourdan-Boddaert, L., & Huet, N.
- Venue
- Behaviour & Information Technology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2002-01
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 273-280
- ISSN
- 0144-929X (ISSN-L)
- 1362-3001
- OpenAlex
- W1991681083
- Cited by
- 274
- References
- 27
- FWCI
- 21.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Do older adults underestimate their actual computer knowledge? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/0144929021000020998
- The paper
- Marquié, J. C., Jourdan-Boddaert, L., & Huet, N. (2002). Do older adults underestimate their actual computer knowledge? Behaviour & Information Technology. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929021000020998
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.