Cited by 121Technology Use by Older AdultsUsability and User Interface DesignDigital Accessibility for Disabilities

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 85 of the 85 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Older adults’ use of mobile device: usability challenges while navigating various interfaces

Open access
Li, Qingchuan, Luximon, Yan·2020·Behaviour & Information Technology

Abstract

Mobile devices are becoming ubiquitous among older adults, but have also caused unprecedented challenges due to the high demands of interaction techniques and changeable design patterns found across various applications. This paper aims to investigate how older adults navigate with mobile interfaces and identify their potential usability challenges while navigating. To do so, we summarised six state-of-the-art mobile interface design patterns and conducted individual usability test and in-depth interview with 22 older adults. Participants were asked to perform 19 navigation tasks that contain these design patterns under realistic usage scenarios. Follow-up interviews were held to collect their detailed comments on usability issues regarding visual design, ease of understanding, and interaction and navigation of the design patterns, as well as their personal experience. The results found that overall older adults were able to navigate contents more effectively than menus and buttons. Participants experienced great challenges in directing their attention to the menus and buttons, understanding the meaning of icons, and interacting with these menu components. In contrast, the content-oriented navigation design performed better in understanding, navigation, and interaction, which could be a promising direction for elderly-friendly mobile application design. Design implications are further discussed for creating an elderly-friendly mobile interface.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/0144929x.2019.1622786

Cites

85 of 85 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 84 references

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Chen K., 2013, Proceedings of the International MultiConference of Engineering and Computer Scientists, 1016
  2. Furuki K., 2013, FUJITSU Scientific & Technical Journal, 49, 196
  3. Gao Q., 2015, Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing and Service Industries, 25, 66
  4. Harris S. R., 2004, Proceedings of ATIT04: 1st International Workshop on Activity Theory Based Practical Methods for IT-Design, 48
  5. Li Q., 2018, International Journal of Design, 12, 93
  6. Maguire M., 2003, Proceedings of HCI International, 22
  7. Murano P., 2012, International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 3, 206

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Li, Q., & Luximon, Y.
Affiliations
Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK)
Corresponding author
Luximon, Yan
Venue
Behaviour & Information Technology
Published
2019-06-03
Volume
39
Issue
8
Pages
837-861
ISSN
  • 0144-929X (ISSN-L)
  • 1362-3001
OpenAlex
W2948526175
Cited by
121
References
84
Citations by year
2026: 31 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 3
FWCI
15.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Behaviour and Information Technology (publishedVersion)
  • PolyU Institutional Research Archive (Hong Kong Polytechnic University) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
The Hong Kong Polytechnic University (RU9Y)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Technology Use by Older Adults
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
  • Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
Keywords
older adults, mobile devices, mobile interface design, navigation, usability problems, design patterns, icons, elderly-friendly design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review