Cited by 1,848Cognitive Abilities and TestingAging and Gerontology ResearchDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research

When does age-related cognitive decline begin?

Open access
Salthouse, Timothy A.·2009·Neurobiology of Aging

Abstract

Cross-sectional comparisons have consistently revealed that increased age is associated with lower levels of cognitive performance, even in the range from 18 to 60 years of age. However, the validity of cross-sectional comparisons of cognitive functioning in young and middle-aged adults has been questioned because of the discrepant age trends found in longitudinal and cross-sectional analyses. The results of the current project suggest that a major factor contributing to the discrepancy is the masking of age-related declines in longitudinal comparisons by large positive effects associated with prior test experience. Results from three methods of estimating retest effects in this project, together with results from studies comparing non-human animals raised in constant environments and from studies examining neurobiological variables not susceptible to retest effects, converge on a conclusion that some aspects of age-related cognitive decline begin in healthy educated adults when they are in their 20s and 30s.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2008.09.023

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • With age, accumulation of greater experience and knowledge can allow for better performance on measures of crystallized intelligence.

    “With age, accumulation of greater experience and knowledge can allow for better performance on measures of crystallized intelligence.”

    From The Alzheimer’s Disease Clinical Spectrum (2019) · cites this paper as [134]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Salthouse, T. A.
Affiliations
University of Virginia (US)
Corresponding author
Salthouse, Timothy A.
Venue
Neurobiology of Aging
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-04
Volume
30
Issue
4
Pages
507-514
ISSN
0197-4580 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2075402786
Cited by
1,848
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 87 · 2025: 125 · 2024: 137 · 2023: 131 · 2022: 113 · 2021: 152 · 2020: 136 · 2019: 150 · 2018: 114 · 2017: 121 · 2016: 87 · 2015: 136 · 2014: 90 · 2013: 73 · 2012: 60
FWCI
82.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neurobiology of Aging (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (R37AG024270)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Keywords
age-related cognitive decline, retest effects, young and middle-aged adults, cognitive aging
MeSH terms
Adult, Aging, Cognition Disorders, Cross-Sectional Studies, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Female, Humans, Learning, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Memory Disorders, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Reproducibility of Results, Artifacts, Age of Onset, Early Diagnosis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review