“Bitten by shyness”: Menstrual hygiene management, sanitation, and the quest for privacy in South Africa.
Abstract
Little is known about how menstruation is managed in low-income settings and whether existing sanitation systems meet women's needs. Using the 'Photovoice' method with 21 women in participatory workshops and in-depth interviews, we collected data on menstrual hygiene management in three sites in Durban, South Africa. All women reported using disposable sanitary pads. Although they were aware that disposable pads were nonbiodegradable, incompatible with waterborne flush systems, and fill up pit latrines, they had little experience with reusable products. Considerable energy was devoted to concealing and containing 'menstrual waste,' and women expressed concern about inadequate privacy during menstruation. All sites lacked discreet disposal options and reliable water access, while outdoor sanitation facilities were considered unsafe. Findings highlight the need for advocacy to improve safety and privacy of facilities for women in this setting.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Privacy of household and shared latrines is compromised by broken or missing doors, missing locks, and poor construction; women worried about being seen walking to latrines, waiting in queues, having others hear or smell their activity, or the proximity of latrines to houses, main roads, or public spaces.
“Privacy of household and shared latrines is compromised by broken [189] or missing doors, [184, 248] missing locks, [175,191,248,251] and poor construction [175,191,240,251].Furthermore, women worried about being seen walking to latrines; [189, 227] waiting in queues; [130] having others hear or smell their activity; [175] or the proximity of latrines to houses, main roads, or public spaces [69,1”
From Water, sanitation, and women’s empowerment: A systematic review and qualitative metasynthesis (2022) · cites this paper as [251]
This information was often provided without clarifying how or when girls were vulnerable to pregnancy.
“however, this information was often provided without clarifying how or when girls were vulnerable to pregnancy”
From Women’s and girls’ experiences of menstruation in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review and qualitative metasynthesis (2019) · cites this paper as [84]
In some studies, girls' post menarche and older women had lingering questions whether menstruation was needed to rid the body of 'dirty blood'.
“or whether it was needed to rid the body of ‘dirty blood’”
From Women’s and girls’ experiences of menstruation in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review and qualitative metasynthesis (2019) · cites this paper as [84]
In some settings such as Ghana, Malawi, South Africa, and Tanzania, mothers were sometimes considered culturally inappropriate, and other female relatives such as aunts or grandmothers were expected to serve in this role.
“whereas in others such as Ghana [4], Malawi [79], South Africa [84], and Tanzania [3], they were sometimes considered culturally inappropriate, and other female relatives such as aunts or grandmothers were expected to serve in this role”
From Women’s and girls’ experiences of menstruation in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review and qualitative metasynthesis (2019) · cites this paper as [84]
Healthcare providers such as nurses or community health workers were mentioned in only a few studies, and always as unsupportive.
“Healthcare providers such as nurses or community health workers were mentioned in only a few studies, and always as unsupportive”
From Women’s and girls’ experiences of menstruation in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review and qualitative metasynthesis (2019) · cites this paper as [84]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 42 · Cited by 67
- Authors
- Scorgie, F., Foster, J., Stadler, J., Phiri, T., Hoppenjans, L., Rees, H., & Muller, N.
- Affiliations
- University of the Witwatersrand (ZA)
- Program for Appropriate Technology in Health (US)
- Centre for the AIDS Programme of Research in South Africa (ZA)
- University of Washington (US)
- Corresponding author
- Scorgie, Fiona
- Venue
- Medical Anthropology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2015-10-05
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 161-176
- ISSN
- 0145-9740 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-5882
- OpenAlex
- W2296470887
- Cited by
- 67
- References
- 42
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 3.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Medical Anthropology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Menstrual Health and Disorders
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Studies and Social Issues
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Child Nutrition and Water Access
- Keywords
- menstrual hygiene management, sanitation, privacy, women's health, disposable sanitary pads, menstrual waste disposal, low-income settings, Durban, pit latrines, water access, menstrual health advocacy
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Female, Humans, Hygiene, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Menstruation, Poverty, Shyness, South Africa, Privacy, Feminine Hygiene Products, Hygiene Products, Young Adult, Anthropology, Medical
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review