The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Willingness to communicate: Antecedents & consequences
Abstract
Willingness to communicate (WTC) is examined at the trait and state levels, which are viewed as complementary. Measures of trait WTC, extraversion, emotional stability, self‐esteem, communication apprehension, and competence were administered to 226 male and female university students. A structural equation model examined the hypothesized antecedents to WTC and revealed a good fit to the data. Seventy of the participants also volunteered for a communication laboratory. Trait WTC was related to volunteering for the lab portion of the study and state WTC was related to initiating a difficult communication task. Also, state perceived competence predicted both time and number of ideas on an easy speaking task; state anxiety predicted time and number of ideas on a difficult speaking task.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Experimental Design: Procedures for the Behavioral Sciences
Kirk, R. (2013) · doi:10.4135/9781483384733 · Cited by 8,539
Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers.
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1987) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.52.1.81 · Cited by 6,404
The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure
Goldberg, L. R. (1992) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/1040-3590.4.1.26 · Cited by 5,530
Cited by
Individual Differences in Second Language Learning
Dörnyei, Z., & Skehan, P. (2003) · The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1002/9780470756492.ch18 · Cited by 563
Cao, Y., & Philp, J. (2006) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2006.05.002 · Cited by 509
Macintyre, P. D., & Legatto, J. J. (2011) · Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1093/applin/amq037 · Cited by 455
Self-citationSituated willingness to communicate in an L2: Interplay of individual characteristics and context
Yashima, T., MacIntyre, P. D., & Ikeda, M. (2018) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/1362168816657851 · Cited by 217
Self-citationExpanding the theoretical base for the dynamics of willingness to communicate
MacIntyre, P. (2020) · Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching · doi:10.14746/ssllt.2020.10.1.6 · Cited by 100
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- MacIntyre, P. D., Babin, P. A., & Clement, R.
- Venue
- Communication Quarterly
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1999-03
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 215-229
- ISSN
- 0040-8573 (ISSN-L)
- 0146-3373
- 1746-4102
- OpenAlex
- W2023385903
- Cited by
- 192
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 0.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Willingness to communicate: Antecedents & consequences. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/01463379909370135
- The paper
- MacIntyre, P. D., Babin, P. A., & Clement, R. (1999). Willingness to communicate: Antecedents & consequences. Communication Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463379909370135
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.