Cited by 5,530Personality Traits and PsychologyPsychological Testing and AssessmentPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure

Goldberg, Lewis R.·1992·Psychological Assessment

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/1040-3590.4.1.26

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Goldberg, L. R.
Affiliations
Oregon Research Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Goldberg, Lewis R.
Venue
Psychological Assessment
Published
1992-03
Volume
4
Issue
1
Pages
26-42
ISSN
  • 1040-3590 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-134X
OpenAlex
W2042962409
Cited by
5,530
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 181 · 2025: 231 · 2024: 283 · 2023: 289 · 2022: 333 · 2021: 338 · 2020: 357 · 2019: 293 · 2018: 263 · 2017: 232 · 2016: 242 · 2015: 214 · 2014: 253 · 2013: 204 · 2012: 207
FWCI
39.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Psychological Assessment (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
Big Five personality traits, personality assessment, trait structure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review