The nature and variability of leisure constraints in daily life: The case of the physically active leisure of older adults
Abstract
Research on nonparticipation in leisure activities has focused on reasons and constraints that appear relatively stable or permanent over time and across behavioral contexts. This conceptualization of constraints is likely due to the use of survey methods that obscure the variable nature of constraints and to the greater importance accorded permanent constraints. A research method for monitoring the nature and variability of the leisure constraints people report for nonparticipation in their daily lives is described that is based on the experiential sampling method and a modification called the alternative activity probe technique. Constraints on the physically active leisure of older adults are examined with the use of this technique. There was corroboration of the time‐related constraints found by survey research and support for the idea that some constraints are transient and vary systematically as a function of the contexts of daily life. Future research possibilities and limitations of the method are discussed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Older adults are more likely to be at home more often than young adults.
“First, unlike the young adults, older adults are more likely to be at home more often [14, 50].”
From Screen or No Screen? Lessons Learnt from a Real-World Deployment Study of Using Voice Assistants With and Without Touchscreen for Older Adults (2023) · cites this paper as [50]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Pressed for Time? Goal Conflict Shapes how Time is Perceived, Spent, and Valued
Etkin, J., Evangelidis, I., & Aaker, J. (2015) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmr.14.0130 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
Chen, C., Lifset, E. T., Han, Y., Roy, A., Hogarth, M., Moore, A. A., Farcas, E., & Weibel, N. (2023) · The 25th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility · doi:10.1145/3597638.3608378 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
“First, unlike the young adults, older adults are more likely to be at home more often [14, 50].”
Background
- Authors
- Mannell, R. C., & Zuzanek, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Waterloo (CA)
- Venue
- Leisure Sciences
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1991-01
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 337-351
- ISSN
- 0149-0400 (ISSN-L)
- 1521-0588
- OpenAlex
- W2090438747
- Cited by
- 64
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 4.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Leisure Sciences (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Recreation, Leisure, Wilderness Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
- Keywords
- leisure constraints, older adults, daily life context, physical activity participation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review