The DOI matches its Crossref record; 49 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Factors that influence PhD candidates’ success: the importance of PhD project characteristics
Open accessAbstract
High dropout rates, delay, and dissatisfaction among PhD students are common problems in doctoral education. Research shows that many different factors are associated with doctoral success, but these factors have not often been studied simultaneously. Moreover, characteristics of the PhD project are mostly neglected. In this study, we investigate which supervision, psychosocial, and project characteristics are related to satisfaction, progress, and quit intentions in a sample of 839 PhD candidates at a university in the Netherlands. Results of regression analyses show that experienced workload was negatively related to satisfaction and progress and positively to quit intentions. The quality of the supervisor-PhD candidate relationship, the PhD candidate’s sense of belonging, the amount of freedom in the project, and working on a project closely related to the supervisor’s research were positively related to satisfaction and negatively to quit intentions. The high workload of PhD candidates should be a major point of attention for universities who wish to increase their rates of PhD completion and PhD candidates’ satisfaction. In addition, the ‘match’ between PhD candidate and supervisor is crucial, both personally – a good relationship – and academically, i.e. that the PhD candidate works on a topic closely related to the supervisor’s research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Leaving College: Rethinking the Causes and Cures of Student Attrition
Bean, J. P. (1988) · The Journal of Higher Education · doi:10.1080/00221546.1988.11780239 · Cited by 7,369
The halo effect: Evidence for unconscious alteration of judgments.
Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.35.4.250 · Cited by 2,021
Leaving College: Rethinking the Causes and Cures of Student Attrition
Tinto, V. (1994) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226922461.001.0001 · Cited by 1,507
Evidence for a mental health crisis in graduate education
Evans, T. M., Bira, L., Gastelum, J. B., Weiss, L. T., & Vanderford, N. L. (2018) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.4089 · Cited by 1,441
Work organization and mental health problems in PhD students
Levecque, K., Anseel, F., De Beuckelaer, A., Van der Heyden, J., & Gisle, L. (2017) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2017.02.008 · Cited by 1,182 · cited 4×
“Percentages of 39–47% of PhD students suffering from mental health problems such as anxiety and depression have been reported (e.g. Evans et al. 2018; Levecque et al. 2017).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialLeaving the Ivory Tower: The Causes and Consequences of Departure from Doctoral Study
Gregory, D. G., & Lovitts, B. E. (2003) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/3089631 · Cited by 992
Golde, C. M. (2005) · The Journal of Higher Education · doi:10.1080/00221546.2005.11772304 · Cited by 524
“I Heard it through the Grapevine”: Doctoral Student Socialization in Chemistry and History
Gardner, S. K. (2007) · Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s10734-006-9020-x · Cited by 450
Should I Stay or Should I Go? Student Descriptions of the Doctoral Attrition Process
Golde, C. M. (2000) · The Review of Higher Education · doi:10.1353/rhe.2000.0004 · Cited by 430
Cited by
Wollast, R., Aelenei, C., Chevalère, J., Van der Linden, N., Galand, B., Azzi, A., Frenay, M., & Klein, O. (2023) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075079.2023.2172151 · Cited by 68
Calling it quits: a longitudinal study of factors associated with dropout among doctoral students
Glorieux, A., Spruyt, B., Minnen, J., & van Tienoven, T. P. (2025) · Studies in Continuing Education · doi:10.1080/0158037x.2024.2314694 · Cited by 26
Berry, C., Niven, J. E., & Hazell, C. M. (2023) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-022-04055-1 · Cited by 19
Ringo, D. S. (2025) · Cogent Education · doi:10.1080/2331186x.2025.2475268 · Cited by 18
Solms, L., van den Heuvel, M., Nevicka, B., & Homan, A. C. (2025) · Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s10734-024-01257-3 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- van Rooij, E., Fokkens-Bruinsma, M., & Jansen, E.
- Venue
- Studies in Continuing Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2019-08-07
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 48-67
- ISSN
- 0158-037X (ISSN-L)
- 1470-126X
- OpenAlex
- W2965744031
- Cited by
- 266
- References
- 49
- FWCI
- 21.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Factors that influence PhD candidates’ success: the importance of PhD project characteristics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/0158037x.2019.1652158
- The paper
- van Rooij, E., Fokkens-Bruinsma, M., & Jansen, E. (2021). Factors that influence PhD candidates’ success: the importance of PhD project characteristics. Studies in Continuing Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037x.2019.1652158
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.