Cited by 83Online and Blended LearningLanguage, Communication, and Linguistic StudiesGlobal Education and Multiculturalism

Opportunity and e‐quality: Intercultural and linguistic issues in global online learning

Goodfellow, Robin, Lea, Mary, Gonzalez, Francisco, Mason, Robin·2001·Distance Education

Abstract

In this paper we investigate some of the ways that cultural and linguistic differences manifest themselves in global online learning environments. We start from the position that the providers of educational opportunity across national and geographic boundaries have a responsibility to consider how their materials and practices can help to promote cross‐cultural understanding. We discuss some of the negative implications of taking a ‘centre and periphery’ view of participants in an internationally‐marketed online MA program, but offer some data on student performance to justify using that perspective to initiate a more in‐depth investigation of their experience of cross‐cultural interaction during the courses. We present some of the outcomes of a qualitative study of student talk about these issues, and identify the topics of ‘cultural otherness’, ‘perceptions of globality’, ‘linguistic difference’, and ‘academic convention’ as focal constructs around which their experiences could be recounted. We discuss how to interpret these narratives, in terms of our aim of promoting cross‐cultural understanding through online education, and also in terms of action needed to address perceived inequalities in the educational opportunity offered by the courses as they stand.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/0158791010220105

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Goodfellow et al. (2001) found that non-English speaking adults' unfamiliarity with the linguistic and academic culture of the UK negatively impacted their success and academic performance.

    “They found that these students' unfamiliarity with the linguistic and academic culture of the UK negatively impacted their success and academic performance.”

    From Questions of Culture in Distance Learning: A Research Review (2009) · cites this paper as Goodfellow et al., 2001

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Goodfellow, R., Lea, M., Gonzalez, F., & Mason, R.
Venue
Distance Education
Published
2001-01
Volume
22
Issue
1
Pages
65-84
ISSN
  • 0158-7919 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-0198
OpenAlex
W2104061035
Cited by
83
References
12
Citations by year
2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
FWCI
27.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Distance Education (publishedVersion)
  • Open Research Online (The Open University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Language, Communication, and Linguistic Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Global Education and Multiculturalism
Keywords
intercultural understanding, educational inequality, language differences, cultural otherness, centre and periphery, student experience, academic conventions, intercultural interaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review