Learner Support in Distance and Networked Learning Environments: Ten Dimensions for Successful Design
Abstract
How do educators and instructional designers assess the effectiveness of the learning environments they design? One important means of ensuring the effectiveness of instruction in distance and face-to-face settings is through provision of learner support. Increasingly, as learners utilize the World Wide Web for collaborative learning, support systems contribute to the processes of learning and assist the learner in developing competencies and confidence in self-regulated learning and social interaction. Originating in the socio-cultural perspective of Vygotskyan theory, the term scaffolding refers to learning support based on social constructivist models of learning. As the World Wide Web becomes increasingly integrated into the delivery of learning experiences at primary, tertiary and secondary levels, the concept of scaffolding needs to be reconsidered because it is not readily translated into contexts where the teacher is not present, such as in online learning environments. The aim of this paper is to offer a conceptualization of the term scaffolding in distance learning, to provide examples of how learners can be supported in the processes of constructivist inquiry in a range of learning settings, and to offer principles for the design of learning support that can be applied across a range of instructional settings.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In a blended learning environment, the design of online language activities must use a pedagogical approach and provide students with support and resources to facilitate their engagement in online tasks.
“In a blended learning environment, the design of online language activities must use a pedagogical approach and provide students with support and resources to facilitate their engagement in online tasks (McLoughlin, 2002).”
From Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis (2000) · cites this paper as McLoughlin, 2002
Cites
THE ROLE OF TUTORING IN PROBLEM SOLVING <sup>*</sup>
Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00381.x · Cited by 8,851 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Wood, Bruner and Ross (1976) originally coined the term scaffolding as a metaphor to describe the effective intervention by a peer, adult or competent person in the learning of another person.”
BackgroundCognitive Apprenticeship: Teaching the Crafts of Reading, Writing, and Mathematics
Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Newman, S. E. (2018) · Knowing, Learning, and Instruction · doi:10.4324/9781315044408-14 · Cited by 3,674 · see citing works
The Construction of Shared Knowledge in Collaborative Problem Solving.
Roschelle, J., & Teasley, S. D. (1995) · Computer Supported Collaborative Learning · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-85098-1_5 · Cited by 2,274 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Research on student learning has had profound and far-reaching in(cid:143) uences on how current practitioners design learning environments and on how they conceptualize learner support systems (e.g., Inglis, Ling & Joosten, 1999; Jarvela, 1995; Roschelle & Teasley, 1995).”
BackgroundInstructional Design Theories and Models
(1983) · doi:10.4324/9780203824283 · Cited by 2,192 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis
Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L. (2000) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/0023-8333.00136 · Cited by 2,414 · see citing works
The current state and impact of Covid‐19 on digital higher education in Germany
Zawacki‐Richter, O. (2021) · Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies · doi:10.1002/hbe2.238 · Cited by 249 · see citing works
- Authors
- McLoughlin, C.
- Corresponding author
- McLoughlin, Catherine
- Venue
- Distance Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2002-10
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 149-162
- ISSN
- 0158-7919 (ISSN-L)
- 1475-0198
- OpenAlex
- W2151217538
- Cited by
- 220
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 25.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Distance Education (publishedVersion)
- Research Bank (Australian Catholic University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Technology in Learning
- Keywords
- student support, scaffolding, distance education, networked learning environments, online learning, student self-regulation, social constructivism, teaching principles, cooperative learning, web-based learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review