Cited by 274Education during COVID-19 pandemicEducational Innovations and ChallengesE-Learning and COVID-19

The current state and impact of Covid‐19 on digital higher education in Germany

Open access
Zawacki‐Richter, Olaf·2021·Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies

Abstract

This case study looks at the effects of the Covid-19 pandemic on teaching and learning at universities in Germany. It examines the question of whether the current practice of Emergency Remote Teaching in the online term 2020 will lead to an acceleration of the digitalization of teaching and learning, and on what we can build upon in this development. In the light of the state of digital higher education in Germany and international experience in the field of distance education, as well as organizational support structures, the results of a longitudinal study on the media use behavior of students will be presented. While the acceptance of e-learning tools was slightly declining before the Covid-19 outbreak, it is to be assumed that the demand for digital offers will rather increase. Despite some reluctant reactions, it can be assumed that the current situation will have a positive effect on digital innovations in university teaching in Germany due to the pressure of the crisis, the great commitment of many teachers, and raised expectations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hbe2.238

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Process-based assessments, which emphasise the development and documentation of learning over time, help ensure originality and deeper engagement.

    “Process-based assessments, which emphasise the development and docu -mentation of learning over time, help ensure originality and deeper engagement [ 43 ].”

    From Redefining student assessment in AI-infused learning environments: a systematic review of challenges and strategies for academic integrity (2026) · cites this paper as [43]

    The passages from “International experience: Online Distance Education” discuss instructional design and support for learners, not process-based assessment. A search for assessment, originality, plagiarism, and documentation of learning over time found no passage in our copy addressing the claimed benefits. Page numbers were not available. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 35 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. Allen, N. H. (2001). Lessons learned on the road to the virtual university. Continuing Higher Education Review, 65, 60– 73.
  2. Bernath, U., & Stöter, J. (2018). Germany. In A. Qayyum & O. Zawacki‐Richter (Eds.), Open and distance education in australia, europe and the americas: national perspectives in a digital age (Vol. 1, pp. 65–78), Singapore: Springer.
  3. Hanft, A., & Brinkmann, K. (Eds.). (2013). Offene Hochschulen—Die Neuausrichtung der Hochschulen auf Lebenslanges Lernen, Munster, Germany: Waxmann.
  4. Hanft, A., Zawacki‐Richter, O., & Gierke, W. B. (Eds.). (2015). Herausforderung Heterogenität beim Übergang in die Hochschule, Munster, Germany: Waxmann.
  5. Hülsmann, T. (2003). Texts that talk back—Asynchronous conferencing: A form of academic discourse? In U. Bernath & E. Rubin (Eds.), Reflections on teaching and learning in an online master program—A case study (pp. 75–120), Oldenburg, Germany: Bibliotheks‐ und Informationssystem der Universität Oldenburg.
  6. Kerres, M., Hanft, A., Wilkesmann, U., & Wolff‐Bendiik, K. (Eds.). (2012). Studium 2020—Positionen und Perspektiven zum lebenslangen Lernen an Hochschulen, Munster, Germany: Waxmann.
  7. Khan, B. H., & Ally, M. (Eds.). (2015). International handbook of E‐learning. Taylor & Francis Group: Routledge.
  8. Lee, C. E., Leow, S. W. Y., & Kong, X. J. (2019). The use of mobile technologies for learning in higher education: Students' readiness. In Y. L. Fong (Ed.), New Media and Digital Inclusion: Embracing the 4th Industrial Revolution (pp. 152– 173). Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
  9. Litto, F. (2018). Brazil. In A. Qayyum & O. Zawacki‐Richter (Eds.), Open and Distance Education in Australia, Europe and the Americas: National Perspectives in a Digital Age (Vol. 1, pp. 29– 43). Singapore: Springer.
  10. Qayyum, A., & Zawacki‐Richter, O. (Eds.). (2018). Open and distance education in australia, europe and the americas: national perspectives in a digital age (Vol. 1), Singapore: Springer https://www.springer.com/la/book/9789811302978
  11. Röbken, H., & Broens, A. (2017). Entwicklung von weiterbildungsspezifischen Qualitätsstandards—Sicherung und kontinuierliche Entwicklung von Qualität. In M. Arnold, J. Haubenreich, R. Götter, H. Röbken, & O. Zawacki‐Richter (Eds.), Entwicklung von weiterbildenden Studienangeboten im MINT‐Bereich, Munster, Germany: Waxmann.
  12. Stalder, F. (2016). Kultur der Digitalität (1st Edition), Frankfurt a. M., Germany: Suhrkamp.
  13. Wilkesmann, U., Virgillito, A., Bröcker, T., & Knopp, L. (2012). Abweichungen vom Bild der Normalstudierenden—Was erwarten Studierende? In M. Kerres, A. Hanft, U. Wilkesmann, & C. Wolff‐Bendik (Eds.), Studium 2020—Positionen und Perspektiven zum lebenslangen Lernen an Hochschulen (pp. 59–81), Münster, Germany: Waxmann.
  14. Zawacki‐Richter, O., Kramer, C., & Müskens, W. (2017). Weniger ist mehr? Studentische Mediennutzung im Wandel [Less is more? Students' media usage patterns in transition]. Synergie ‐ Fachmagazin für Digitalisierung in der Lehre, 2(3), 70– 73.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zawacki‐Richter, O.
Affiliations
Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg (DE)
Corresponding author
Zawacki‐Richter, Olaf
Venue
Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-12-03
Volume
3
Issue
1
Pages
218-226
ISSN
2578-1863 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3109151985
Cited by
249
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 68 · 2022: 69 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 1
FWCI
67.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
University of South Africa
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education during COVID-19 pandemic
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Innovations and Challenges
  • Social Sciences › Education › E-Learning and COVID-19
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, emergency remote teaching, digital higher education, digitalization of teaching, university teaching, online learning tools, distance education, Germany

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review