Instructor–Learner Interaction in Online Courses: The relative perceived importance of particular instructor actions on performance and satisfaction
Abstract
This article examines the relative perceived importance of 19 instructor actions in online courses according to both instructors and students. The instructor actions were culled from guidelines in the online learning literature base and then reviewed and rated by 14 experts. Thirty‐two online instructors and 170 students from their classes at a large public university and a private online university were asked to review and rate these guidelines. Findings show that the instructors believe that learner performance is more likely tied to instructor actions that are focused on course content and provide both proactive (models, expectations) and reactive (feedback) information to learners about their ability to demonstrate knowledge of course material, but learner satisfaction is more likely tied to learners’ feeling that their interpersonal communication needs are met. Learners rated items focused on communication needs and being treated as individuals as most important, aligning their stated preferences with the instructors’ perceptions of what actions are most satisfying to online learners.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Social presence is positively related to student satisfaction.
“Researchers have found social presence to be positively related to students' learning and their sense of being connected within the class (Shea et al., 2006), higher performance on writing assignments (Picciano, 2002), and student satisfaction (Dennen et al., 2007).”
From Measuring Student Engagement in the Online Course: The Online Student Engagement Scale (OSE) (2015) · cites this paper as Dennen et al., 2007
Student engagement is a key element in keeping students connected with the course and, thus, with their learning.
“Student engagement is a key element in keeping students connected with the course and, thus, with their learning (Dennen, Darabi, & Smith, 2007; Kehrwald, 2008; Robinson & Hullinger, 2008; Shea, Li, & Pickett, 2006; Swan, Shea, Fredericksen, Pickett, Pelz, & Maher, 2000).”
From Measuring Student Engagement in the Online Course: The Online Student Engagement Scale (OSE) (2015) · cites this paper as Dennen, Darabi, & Smith, 2007
Research about online learning supports the idea that student engagement is crucial to student success.
“In general, the research about online learning supports the idea that student engagement is crucial to student success (Dennen et al., 2007; Kehrwald, 2008; Robinson & Hullinger, 2008; Shea et al., 2006; Swan et al., 2000).”
From Measuring Student Engagement in the Online Course: The Online Student Engagement Scale (OSE) (2015) · cites this paper as Dennen et al., 2007
Cites
Development and use of the ARCS model of instructional design
Keller, J. M. (1987) · Journal of Instructional Development · doi:10.1007/bf02905780 · Cited by 2,332 · see citing works
ASSESSING TEACHING PRESENCE IN A COMPUTER CONFERENCING CONTEXT
Anderson, T., Rourke, L., Garrison, R., & Archer, W. (2001) · Online Learning · doi:10.24059/olj.v5i2.1875 · Cited by 1,885 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Measuring Student Engagement in the Online Course: The Online Student Engagement Scale (OSE)
Dixson, M. D. (2015) · Online Learning · doi:10.24059/olj.v19i4.561 · Cited by 707 · see citing works
“Student engagement is a key element in keeping students connected with the course and, thus, with their learning (Dennen, Darabi, & Smith, 2007; Kehrwald, 2008; Robinson & Hullinger, 2008; Shea, Li, & Pickett, 2006; Swan, Shea, Fredericksen, Pickett, Pelz, & Maher, 2000).”
BackgroundKim, S., & Kim, D.-J. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13126734 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
- Authors
- Dennen, V. P., Aubteen Darabi, A., & Smith, L. J.
- Affiliations
- Florida State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Dennen, Vanessa P.
- ORCID
- Dennen, Vanessa P.
- Venue
- Distance Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2007-05
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 65-79
- ISSN
- 0158-7919 (ISSN-L)
- 1475-0198
- OpenAlex
- W2165724534
- Cited by
- 380
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 24
- FWCI
- 38.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Distance Education (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Florida State University
- U.S. Navy
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
- Social Sciences › Education › Evaluation of Teaching Practices
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Communication in Education and Healthcare
- Keywords
- instructor-learner interaction, online courses, learner performance, student satisfaction, feedback, interpersonal communication, student preferences, instructor perceptions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review