Cited by 380Online and Blended LearningEvaluation of Teaching PracticesCommunication in Education and Healthcare

Instructor–Learner Interaction in Online Courses: The relative perceived importance of particular instructor actions on performance and satisfaction

Dennen, Vanessa P., Aubteen Darabi, A., Smith, Linda J.·2007·Distance Education

Abstract

This article examines the relative perceived importance of 19 instructor actions in online courses according to both instructors and students. The instructor actions were culled from guidelines in the online learning literature base and then reviewed and rated by 14 experts. Thirty‐two online instructors and 170 students from their classes at a large public university and a private online university were asked to review and rate these guidelines. Findings show that the instructors believe that learner performance is more likely tied to instructor actions that are focused on course content and provide both proactive (models, expectations) and reactive (feedback) information to learners about their ability to demonstrate knowledge of course material, but learner satisfaction is more likely tied to learners’ feeling that their interpersonal communication needs are met. Learners rated items focused on communication needs and being treated as individuals as most important, aligning their stated preferences with the instructors’ perceptions of what actions are most satisfying to online learners.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/01587910701305319

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Social presence is positively related to student satisfaction.

    “Researchers have found social presence to be positively related to students' learning and their sense of being connected within the class (Shea et al., 2006), higher performance on writing assignments (Picciano, 2002), and student satisfaction (Dennen et al., 2007).”
  • Student engagement is a key element in keeping students connected with the course and, thus, with their learning.

    “Student engagement is a key element in keeping students connected with the course and, thus, with their learning (Dennen, Darabi, & Smith, 2007; Kehrwald, 2008; Robinson & Hullinger, 2008; Shea, Li, & Pickett, 2006; Swan, Shea, Fredericksen, Pickett, Pelz, & Maher, 2000).”

    From Measuring Student Engagement in the Online Course: The Online Student Engagement Scale (OSE) (2015) · cites this paper as Dennen, Darabi, & Smith, 2007

  • Research about online learning supports the idea that student engagement is crucial to student success.

    “In general, the research about online learning supports the idea that student engagement is crucial to student success (Dennen et al., 2007; Kehrwald, 2008; Robinson & Hullinger, 2008; Shea et al., 2006; Swan et al., 2000).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dennen, V. P., Aubteen Darabi, A., & Smith, L. J.
Affiliations
Florida State University (US)
Corresponding author
Dennen, Vanessa P.
Venue
Distance Education
Published
2007-05
Volume
28
Issue
1
Pages
65-79
ISSN
  • 0158-7919 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-0198
OpenAlex
W2165724534
Cited by
380
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 24
FWCI
38.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Distance Education (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Florida State University
  • U.S. Navy
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
  • Social Sciences › Education › Evaluation of Teaching Practices
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Communication in Education and Healthcare
Keywords
instructor-learner interaction, online courses, learner performance, student satisfaction, feedback, interpersonal communication, student preferences, instructor perceptions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review