The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evaluating videoconferencing systems for the quality of the educational experience
Abstract
This study analyzed four widely used videoconferencing systems: Zoom, Skype, Microsoft Teams, and WhatsApp. Using experiential e-learning as the framework for analysis, this study examined the systems’ general characteristics, learning-related features, and usability. We conducted an analytical evaluation and analyzed system features in regard to their impact on the quality of the online educational experience. The results of this analysis provide guidance for selecting effective videoconferencing systems to support learning. They also offer insights on ways to explore teaching approaches and pedagogies for distance education. This paper offers a set of recommendations as well as suggestions for videoconferencing system improvements.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The origins of intelligence in children.
Piaget, J. (1952) · doi:10.1037/11494-000 · Cited by 10,687
The Difference between Emergency Remote Teaching and Online Learning
Hodges, C. B., Moore, S., Lockee, B. B., Trust, T., & Bond, M. A. (2024) · Handbook of Research in Online Learning · doi:10.1163/9789004702813_021 · Cited by 6,253
New skills for new classrooms: Training tutors to teach languages online
Hampel, R., & Stickler, U. (2005) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588220500335455 · Cited by 387
Cited by
Virtual Work Meetings during the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Good, Bad, and Ugly
Karl, K. A., Peluchette, J. V., & Aghakhani, N. (2022) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/10464964211015286 · Cited by 375
Li, D., Ortegas, K. D., & White, M. (2023) · Systems · doi:10.3390/systems11070319 · Cited by 253
Bedenlier, S., Wunder, I., Gläser-Zikuda, M., Kammerl, R., Kopp, B., Ziegler, A., & Händel, M. (2021) · International Journal of Educational Research Open · doi:10.1016/j.ijedro.2021.100068 · Cited by 93
Nkomo, S., Ngoepe, M., Onwukanjo, S. A., Mwilongo, K. J., Kachota, B., Rupasinghe, T. P., Nsibirano, R., Nsibirano, K. A., Abu, A. A., Isah, A. Y., et al. (2023) · doi:10.36615/9781776460533
Metadata
- Authors
- Correia, A.-P., Liu, C., & Xu, F.
- Venue
- Distance Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2020-09-27
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 429-452
- ISSN
- 0158-7919 (ISSN-L)
- 1475-0198
- OpenAlex
- W3088668021
- Cited by
- 229
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 64.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evaluating videoconferencing systems for the quality of the educational experience. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/01587919.2020.1821607
- The paper
- Correia, A.-P., Liu, C., & Xu, F. (2020). Evaluating videoconferencing systems for the quality of the educational experience. Distance Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2020.1821607
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
