Cited by 234International Business and FDIGlobal trade and economicsGlobal Financial Crisis and Policies

Transatlantic Investment by Multinational Firms: A Rivalistic Phenomenon?

Graham, Edward M.·1978·Journal of Post Keynesian Economics

Abstract

(1978). Transatlantic Investment by Multinational Firms: A Rivalistic Phenomenon? Journal of Post Keynesian Economics: Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 82-99.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/01603477.1978.11489095

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Graham, E. M.
Corresponding author
Graham, Edward M.
Venue
Journal of Post Keynesian Economics
Published
1978-09
Volume
1
Issue
1
Pages
82-99
ISSN
  • 0160-3477 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-7821
OpenAlex
W122128307
Cited by
234
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 7
FWCI
3.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Post Keynesian Economics (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › International Business and FDI
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Global trade and economics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Global Financial Crisis and Policies
Keywords
multinational corporations, foreign direct investment, rivalry, international capital flows

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review