Cited by 29Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesChild Therapy and DevelopmentEducational Games and Gamification

Exploring the efficacy of cognitive behavioral therapy and role-playing games as an intervention for adults with social anxiety

Varrette, Matthew, Berkenstock, Jack, Greenwood-Ericksen, Adams, Ortega, Anthony, Michaels, Faith, Pietrobon, Veronica, Schodorf, Marc·2023·Social Work With Groups

Abstract

Tabletop role-playing games (TTRPGs) have increased in popularity as a hobby and allows multiple people to play together online or in person. Group activities such as TTRPGs have been used to improve social skills and mental well-being Although there is qualitative and anecdotal studies and reports about the efficacy of the therapeutic application of TTRPGs, no related studies have employed quantitative measures or mental health screening tools. This study explored whether intentionally introduced cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) delivered through the medium of TTRPG groups could positively affect social skills, reduce anxiety symptoms and behaviors, and enhance the mental well-being of participants. Data was collected from May 2020 to February 2021 using the Social Phobia Inventory, Generalized Anxiety Disorder Assessment, Social Skills Inventory, and Group Satisfaction Scale and debriefs with participants. The study was completed virtually. All the groups showed an average decrease in self-reported anxiety; one of the therapeutic TTRPG groups decreased in self-reported social anxiety, while the others remained the same. All of them showed improved social skill scores and the participants were very satisfied with the overall group experience, thus suggesting that their needs were met.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/01609513.2022.2146029

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Varrette, M., Berkenstock, J., Greenwood-Ericksen, A., Ortega, A., Michaels, F., Pietrobon, V., & Schodorf, M.
Affiliations
  • The Bodhana Group
  • Harrisburg University of Science and Technology (US)
Corresponding author
Varrette, Matthew
Venue
Social Work With Groups
Published
2022-11-18
Volume
46
Issue
2
Pages
140-156
ISSN
  • 0160-9513 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-9481
OpenAlex
W4309288325
Cited by
29
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4
FWCI
4.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Social Work With Groups (publishedVersion)
Funders
Harrisburg University of Science and Technology
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Therapy and Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Games and Gamification
Keywords
tabletop role-playing games, cognitive behavioral therapy, social anxiety, group therapy, social skills, anxiety symptoms, psychological well-being, virtual group intervention, group satisfaction, Social Phobia Inventory, Social Skills Inventory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review