Cited by 63Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsCancer survivorship and careMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation

Conceptualization and development of the acceptance of chronic health conditions scale

Stuifbergen, Alexa, Becker, Heather, Blozis, Shelley, Beal, Claudia·2008·Issues in Mental Health Nursing

Abstract

Acceptance of chronic conditions often has been studied from the perspective of grief and loss. This paper presents a new conceptualization of acceptance of chronic conditions that is grounded in the perspective of those living with a chronic condition and focuses on adaptation to and acceptance of change in one's life. Data obtained from a sample of 822 persons with multiple sclerosis and a sample of more than 2,000 polio survivors support the reliability and validity of the new Acceptance of Chronic Health Conditions Scale.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/01612840701792548

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stuifbergen, A., Becker, H., Blozis, S., & Beal, C.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
  • University of California, Davis (US)
Venue
Issues in Mental Health Nursing
Published
2008-01
Volume
29
Issue
2
Pages
101-114
ISSN
  • 0161-2840 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-4673
OpenAlex
W2041442274
Cited by
62
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Issues in Mental Health Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Nursing Research (R01NR003195)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Keywords
scale development, multiple sclerosis, polio survivors, adaptation to change, grief and loss, psychometric validation, reliability and validity
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Adaptation, Psychological, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Attitude to Health, Chronic Disease, Female, Humans, Life Change Events, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Psychological, Multiple Sclerosis, Nursing Assessment, Poliomyelitis, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Southwestern United States, Nursing Methodology Research, Qualitative Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review