Cited by 2Multiple Sclerosis Research StudiesMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

How and for whom does supportive adjustment to multiple sclerosis cognitive-behavioural therapy work? A mediated moderation analysis

Open access
Goldsmith, Kimberley, Hudson, Joanna L., Chalder, Trudie, Dennison, Laura, Moss-Morris, Rona·2020·Behaviour Research and Therapy

Abstract

The supportive adjustment for multiple sclerosis (saMS) randomised controlled trial showed cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) reduced distress at 12-months compared to supportive listening (SL). Larger changes in distress and functional impairment following CBT occurred in participants with clinical distress at baseline. This secondary analysis investigates whether CBT treatment effects occur through pre-defined CBT mechanisms of change in the total cohort and clinically distressed subgroup. 94 participants were randomised to saMS CBT or SL. Primary outcomes were distress and functional impairment (12 months). Mediators included cognitive-behavioural variables at post-treatment (15 weeks). Structural equation mediation and mediated-moderation models adjusting for baseline confounders assessed mediation overall and by distress level. Significant mediation was found but only for those with clinical distress at baseline. Illness acceptance (-0.20, 95% confidence interval -0.01 to -0.46) and reduced embarrassment avoidance behaviours (-0.22, -0.02 to -0.58) mediated CBT's effect on distress. Changes in beliefs about processing emotions (-0.19, -0.001 to -0.46) mediated CBT's effect on functional impairment. saMS CBT had effects on distress and functional impairment via some of the hypothesised mechanisms drawn from a theoretical model of adjustment for MS but only among participants with clinical distress at baseline. Increasing acceptance and emotional expression and decreasing embarrassment avoidance improves MS adjustment.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.brat.2020.103594

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. MacKinnon, D. P. (2001). Mediating variable. In N. J. Smelser & P. B. Baltes (Eds.), International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences (Vol. 11, pp. 9503-9507). Amsterdam: Elsevier

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Goldsmith, K., Hudson, J. L., Chalder, T., Dennison, L., & Moss-Morris, R.
Affiliations
  • King's College London (GB)
  • University of Southampton (GB)
Corresponding author
Moss-Morris, Rona
Venue
Behaviour Research and Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-05
Volume
128
Pages
103594
ISSN
0005-7967 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3008087705
Cited by
2
References
37
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2022: 1
FWCI
0.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Behaviour Research and Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute for Health Research
  • South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust
  • King’s College London
  • Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation United Kingdom
  • Stroke Foundation
  • King's College London
  • Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
multiple sclerosis, cognitive behavioral therapy, distress, functional disability, acceptance of illness, emotional expression, mechanisms of change
MeSH terms
Emotional Adjustment, Embarrassment, Psychological Distress, Mediation Analysis, Functional Status, Adult, Avoidance Learning, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Multiple Sclerosis, Social Adjustment, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Patient Selection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review