The DOI matches its Crossref record.
RAB7L1 promoter polymorphism and risk of Parkinson’s disease; a case-control study
Abstract
Introduction Recent genome-wide association studies have explored some new loci in association with Parkinson's disease (PD). RAB7L1 is an important gene involved in one of the important neurological pathways, located in PARK16 locus. We performed a case-control study to examine the association between rs823144 SNP located in the promoter region of the RAB7L1 gene and PD risk in Iranian population. Methods A total of 960 samples including 480 PD patients and 480 healthy controls were collected for analysis of the RAB7L1 rs823144 polymorphism using polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR - RFLP) method. Results We found significant differences in genotypic and allelic frequencies between patients and controls. Significant association was found between presence of minor allele (C) and decreased risk of PD development (p = 0.008, OR = 0.74 (0.605-0.924)). Also another significant association was observed between the CC genotype and PD (p = 0.004, OR = 0.441 (0.252-0.772)). Conclusion Our data support the association between rs823144 and decreased risk of PD.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
RAB29 is contained within the PARK16 locus, which is linked to Parkinson's disease.
“RAB29 is contained within the PARK16 locus, which is linked to Parkinson’s disease”
From Distinct Roles for RAB10 and RAB29 in Pathogenic LRRK2-Mediated Endolysosomal Trafficking Alterations (2020) · cites this paper as [50]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 16
- 10.1111/iji.2014.41.issue-6 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.11.033 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2014.07.013 · DOI
- 10.1186/2047-9158-2-5 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.molmed.2006.09.007 · DOI
- 10.1001/archneurol.2011.924 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1159/000134591 · DOI
- 10.1016/S1474-4422(06)70471-9 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/ng.485 · DOI
- 10.1038/ng.487 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181eccfcd · DOI
- 10.1038/ejhg.2010.125 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.4238/2015.April.10.7 · DOI
- 10.1002/mds.v26.5 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62345-8 · DOI
- 10.1179/1743132815Y.0000000085 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Rivero-Ríos, P., Romo-Lozano, M., Fernández, B., Fdez, E., & Hilfiker, S. (2020) · Cells · doi:10.3390/cells9071719 · Cited by 38
Metadata
- Authors
- Khaligh, A., Goudarzian, M., Moslem, A., Mehrtash, A., Jamshidi, J., Darvish, H., & Emamalizadeh, B.
- Affiliations
- Iranian Research Center of Healthy Aging, Sabzevar University of Medical Sciences, Sabzevar, Iran
- Sabzevar University of Medical Sciences, Sabzevar, Iran
- Molecular Medicine Department, Biotechnology Research Center, Pasteur Institute of Iran, Tehran, Iran
- Noncommunicable Diseases Research Center, Fasa University of Medical Sciences, Fasa, Iran
- Department of Medical Genetics, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Genetics, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
- Venue
- Neurological Research
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2017-02-28
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 468-471
- ISSN
- 0161-6412
- 1743-1328
- Cited by
- 13
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review