The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Relative Entropy Measures of Multivariate Dependence
Abstract
There has been a lot of work on measures of dependence or association for bivariate probability distributions or bivariate data. These measures usually assume that the variables are both continuous or both categorical. In comparison, there is very little work on multivariate or conditional measures of dependence. The purpose of this article is to discuss measures of multivariate dependence and measures of conditional dependence based on relative entropies. These measures are conceptually very general, as they can be used for a set of variables that can be a mixture of continuous, ordinal-categorical, and nominal-categorical variables. For continuous or ordinal-categorical variables, a certain transformation of relative entropy to the interval [0, 1] leads to generalizations of the correlation, multiple-correlation, and partial-correlation coefficients. If all variables are nominal categorical, the relative entropies are standardized to take a maximum of 1 and then transformed so that in the bivariate case, there is a relative reduction in variability interpretation like that for the correlation coefficient. The relative entropy measures of dependence are compared with commonly used bivariate measures of association such as Kendall's τb and Goodman and Kruskal's λ and with measures of dependence based on Pearson's ϕ2 distance. Examples suggest that these new measures of dependence should be useful additional summary values for nonmonotonic or nonlinear dependence. Assuming that the multivariate data are a random sample, the statistical measures of dependence with estimated probability density or mass functions can be studied asymptotically. Standard errors are obtained when all variables are categorical, and an outline of what must be done in the case of all continuous variables is given.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis
Silverman, B. W. (2018) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.1201/9781315140919 · Cited by 15,796
Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis
(1986) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-3324-9 · Cited by 8,525
The proof and measurement of association between two things
Spearman, C. (1904) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1412159 · Cited by 8,039
A NEW MEASURE OF RANK CORRELATION
KENDALL, M. G. (1938) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/30.1-2.81 · Cited by 7,269
Kendall, M. G. (1957) · Biometrika · doi:10.2307/2333282 · Cited by 6,383
Journal of The American Statistical Association
Fienberg, S. E. (2005) · Encyclopedia of Statistical Sciences · doi:10.1002/0471667196.ess1317 · Cited by 6,125
Mathematical Methods of Statistics.
Geary, R. C., & Cramer, H. (1947) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/2226151 · Cited by 5,927
Inequalities: Theory of Majorization and its Applications.
Arnold, B. C., Marshall, A. W., & Olkin, I. (1981) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2287859 · Cited by 4,870
Inequalities - Theory of Majorization and Its Applications
(1979) · Mathematics in Science and Engineering · doi:10.1016/c2009-0-22048-4 · Cited by 2,870
Geary, R. C., & Kendall, M. G. (1949) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/2226580 · Cited by 2,416
Cited by
Earthquake Damage Assessment of Buildings Using VHR Optical and SAR Imagery
Brunner, D., Lemoine, G., & Bruzzone, L. (2010) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2009.2038274 · Cited by 586
Estimating Divergence Functionals and the Likelihood Ratio by Convex Risk Minimization
Nguyen, X., Wainwright, M. J., & Jordan, M. I. (2010) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/tit.2010.2068870 · Cited by 379
Information decomposition and the informational architecture of the brain
Luppi, A. I., Rosas, F. E., Mediano, P. A. M., Menon, D. K., & Stamatakis, E. A. (2024) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2023.11.005 · Cited by 140
Dietrich, J. P., Popp, A., & Lotze-Campen, H. (2013) · Ecological Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2013.05.009 · Cited by 50
Detection of long-range concerted motions in protein by a distance covariance
Roy, A., & Post, C. B. (2012) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/ct300565f · Cited by 21
Metadata
- Authors
- Joe, H.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Statistical Association
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1989-03
- Volume
- 84
- Issue
- 405
- Pages
- 157-164
- ISSN
- 0162-1459 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-274X
- OpenAlex
- W2014078900
- Cited by
- 324
- References
- 30
- FWCI
- 2.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Relative Entropy Measures of Multivariate Dependence. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/01621459.1989.10478751
- The paper
- Joe, H. (1989). Relative Entropy Measures of Multivariate Dependence. Journal of the American Statistical Association. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1989.10478751
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.