Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 658

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Investigating Smooth Multiple Regression by the Method of Average Derivatives

Open access
Härdle, Wolfgang, Stoker, Thomas M.·1989·Journal of the American Statistical Association

Abstract

Let (x 1, …, xk, y) be a random vector where y denotes a response on the vector x of predictor variables. In this article we propose a technique [termed average derivative estimation (ADE)] for studying the mean response m(x) = E(y | x) through the estimation of the k vector of average derivatives δ = E(m′). The ADE procedure involves two stages: first estimate δ using an estimator , and then approximate m(x) by ), where ĝ is an estimator of the univariate regression of y on . We argue that the ADE procedure exhibits several attractive characteristics: data summarization through interpretable coefficients, graphical depiction of the possible nonlinearity between y and , and theoretical properties consistent with dimension reduction. We motivate the ADE procedure using examples of models that take the form . In this framework, δ is shown to be proportional to β and [mcirc](x) infers m(x) exactly. The focus of the procedure is on the estimator , which is based on a simple average of kernel smoothers and is shown to be a √N consistent and asymptotically normal estimator of δ. The estimator ĝ(·) is a standard kernel regression estimator and is shown to have the same properties as the kernel regression of y on x Tδ. In sum, the estimator δ converges to δ at the rate typically available in parametric estimation problems, and [mcirc](x) converges to E(y | xTδ) at the optimal one-dimensional nonparametric rate. We also give a consistent estimator of the asymptotic covariance matrix of δ, to facilitate inference. We discuss the conditions underlying these results, including how √N consistent estimation of δ requires undersmoothing relative to pointwise multivariate estimation. We also indicate the relationship between the ADE method and projection pursuit regression. For illustration, we apply the ADE method to data on automobile collisions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/01621459.1989.10478863

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 26 references

Cited by

See all 658

Metadata

Authors
Härdle, W., & Stoker, T. M.
Venue
Journal of the American Statistical Association
Published
1989-12
Volume
84
Issue
408
Pages
986-995
ISSN
  • 0162-1459 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-274X
OpenAlex
W2053200087
Cited by
658
References
26
FWCI
10.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Investigating Smooth Multiple Regression by the Method of Average Derivatives. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/01621459.1989.10478863
The paper
Härdle, W., & Stoker, T. M. (1989). Investigating Smooth Multiple Regression by the Method of Average Derivatives. Journal of the American Statistical Association. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1989.10478863

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.