Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 476

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Bayesian Analysis of Constrained Parameter and Truncated Data Problems Using Gibbs Sampling

Gelfand, Alan E., Smith, Adrian F. M., Lee, Tai-Ming·1992·Journal of the American Statistical Association

Abstract

Constrained parameter problems arise in a wide variety of applications, including bioassay, actuarial graduation, ordinal categorical data, response surfaces, reliability development testing, and variance component models. Truncated data problems arise naturally in survival and failure time studies, ordinal data models, and categorical data studies aimed at uncovering underlying continuous distributions. In many applications both parameter constraints and data truncation are present. The statistical literature on such problems is very extensive, reflecting both the problems’ widespread occurrence in applications and the methodological challenges that they pose. However, it is striking that so little of this applied and theoretical literature involves a parametric Bayesian perspective. From a technical viewpoint, this perhaps is not difficult to understand. The fundamental tool for Bayesian calculations in typical realistic models is (multidimensional) numerical integration, which often is problematic in unconstrained contexts and can be well-nigh impossible for the kinds of constrained problems we consider. In this article we show that Bayesian calculations can be implemented routinely for constrained parameter and truncated data problems by means of the Gibbs sampler. Specific models discussed include constrained multinormal parameters, constrained linear model parameters, ordered parameters in experimental family models, data and order restricted parameters from exponential distributions, straight line regression with censoring and bivariate grouped data models. Analysis of data sets illustrating the first two of these settings is provided.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/01621459.1992.10475235

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 476

Metadata

Authors
Gelfand, A. E., Smith, A. F. M., & Lee, T.-M.
Venue
Journal of the American Statistical Association
Published
1992-06
Volume
87
Issue
418
Pages
523-532
ISSN
  • 0162-1459 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-274X
OpenAlex
W2068887647
Cited by
476
References
3
FWCI
17.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bayesian Analysis of Constrained Parameter and Truncated Data Problems Using Gibbs Sampling. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/01621459.1992.10475235
The paper
Gelfand, A. E., Smith, A. F. M., & Lee, T.-M. (1992). Bayesian Analysis of Constrained Parameter and Truncated Data Problems Using Gibbs Sampling. Journal of the American Statistical Association. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1992.10475235

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.