The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Inference for Deterministic Simulation Models: The Bayesian Melding Approach
Abstract
Deterministic simulation models are used in many areas of science, engineering, and policy making. Typically, these are complex models that attempt to capture underlying mechanisms in considerable detail, and they have many user-specified inputs. The inputs are often specified by some form of trial-and-error approach in which plausible values are postulated, the corresponding outputs inspected, and the inputs modified until plausible outputs are obtained. Here we address the issue of more formal inference for such models. A probabilistic approach, called Bayesian synthesis, was shown to suffer from the Borel paradox, according to which the results can depend on the parameterization of the model. We propose a modified approach, called Bayesian melding which takes into full account information and uncertainty about both inputs and outputs to the model, while avoiding the Borel paradox. This is done by recognizing the existence of two priors, one implicit and one explicit, on each input and output; these are combined via logarithmic pooling. Bayesian melding is then standard Bayesian inference with the pooled prior on inputs, and is implemented here by posterior simulation using the sampling-importance-resampling (SIR) algorithm. We develop this initially for invertible models, and then extend it to the more difficult and more common case of noninvertible models. We illustrate the methodology using a number of examples. Simulation studies show that the method outperforms a simpler Bayesian approach in terms of mean squared error. A number of open research problems are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kass, R. E., & Raftery, A. E. (1995) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1995.10476572 · Cited by 12,558
Self-citationHoeting, J. A., Madigan, D., Raftery, A. E., & Volinsky, C. T. (1999) · Statistical Science · doi:10.1214/ss/1009212519 · Cited by 4,118
Self-citation
Cited by
Bayesian calibration of computer models
Kennedy, M. C., & O'Hagan, A. (2001) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/1467-9868.00294 · Cited by 4,222
Characterising performance of environmental models
Bennett, N. D., Croke, B. F. W., Guariso, G., Guillaume, J. H. A., Hamilton, S. H., Jakeman, A. J., Marsili-Libelli, S., Newham, L. T. H., Norton, J. P., Perrin, C., et al. (2013) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.09.011 · Cited by 1,536
Combining Field Data and Computer Simulations for Calibration and Prediction
Higdon, D., Kennedy, M., Cavendish, J. C., Cafeo, J. A., & Ryne, R. D. (2004) · SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing · doi:10.1137/s1064827503426693 · Cited by 623
Price, M. J., Ades, A., Soldan, K., Welton, N. J., Macleod, J., Simms, I., DeAngelis, D., Turner, K. M., & Horner, P. J. (2016) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta20220 · Cited by 494
The potential impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the tuberculosis epidemic a modelling analysis
Cilloni, L., Fu, H., Vesga, J. F., Dowdy, D., Pretorius, C., Ahmedov, S., Nair, S. A., Mosneaga, A., Masini, E., Sahu, S., et al. (2020) · EClinicalMedicine · doi:10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100603 · Cited by 339
Metadata
- Authors
- Poole, D., & Raftery, A. E.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Statistical Association
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2000-12
- Volume
- 95
- Issue
- 452
- Pages
- 1244-1255
- ISSN
- 0162-1459 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-274X
- OpenAlex
- W2049588492
- Cited by
- 381
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 9.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Inference for Deterministic Simulation Models: The Bayesian Melding Approach. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/01621459.2000.10474324
- The paper
- Poole, D., & Raftery, A. E. (2000). Inference for Deterministic Simulation Models: The Bayesian Melding Approach. Journal of the American Statistical Association. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.2000.10474324
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.