The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Quantile Regression for Analyzing Heterogeneity in Ultra-High Dimension
Open accessAbstract
Ultra-high dimensional data often display heterogeneity due to either heteroscedastic variance or other forms of non-location-scale covariate effects. To accommodate heterogeneity, we advocate a more general interpretation of sparsity which assumes that only a small number of covariates influence the conditional distribution of the response variable given all candidate covariates; however, the sets of relevant covariates may differ when we consider different segments of the conditional distribution. In this framework, we investigate the methodology and theory of nonconvex penalized quantile regression in ultra-high dimension. The proposed approach has two distinctive features: (1) it enables us to explore the entire conditional distribution of the response variable given the ultra-high dimensional covariates and provides a more realistic picture of the sparsity pattern; (2) it requires substantially weaker conditions compared with alternative methods in the literature; thus, it greatly alleviates the difficulty of model checking in the ultra-high dimension. In theoretic development, it is challenging to deal with both the nonsmooth loss function and the nonconvex penalty function in ultra-high dimensional parameter space. We introduce a novel sufficient optimality condition which relies on a convex differencing representation of the penalized loss function and the subdifferential calculus. Exploring this optimality condition enables us to establish the oracle property for sparse quantile regression in the ultra-high dimension under relaxed conditions. The proposed method greatly enhances existing tools for ultra-high dimensional data analysis. Monte Carlo simulations demonstrate the usefulness of the proposed procedure. The real data example we analyzed demonstrates that the new approach reveals substantially more information compared with alternative methods.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Koenker, R., & Bassett, G. (1978) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1913643 · Cited by 13,316
Bertsekas, D. P. (1997) · Journal of the Operational Research Society · doi:10.1038/sj.jors.2600425 · Cited by 11,726
Variable Selection via Nonconcave Penalized Likelihood and its Oracle Properties
Fan, J., & Li, R. (2001) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1198/016214501753382273 · Cited by 8,900
Self-citationThe adaptive lasso and its oracle properties
Zou, H. (2006) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1198/016214506000000735 · Cited by 7,470
Enhancing Sparsity by Reweighted ℓ 1 Minimization
Candès, E. J., Wakin, M. B., & Boyd, S. P. (2008) · Journal of Fourier Analysis and Applications · doi:10.1007/s00041-008-9045-x · Cited by 4,863
Koenker, R. (2005) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511754098 · Cited by 4,551
Nearly unbiased variable selection under minimax concave penalty
Zhang, C.-H. (2010) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/09-aos729 · Cited by 3,835
Sure Independence Screening for Ultrahigh Dimensional Feature Space
Fan, J., & Lv, J. (2008) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9868.2008.00674.x · Cited by 2,711
The Dantzig selector: Statistical estimation when p is much larger than n
Candes, E., & Tao, T. (2007) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/009053606000001523 · Cited by 1,747
Robust Tests for Heteroscedasticity Based on Regression Quantiles
Koenker, R., & Bassett, G. (1982) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1912528 · Cited by 1,629
Cited by
Strong oracle optimality of folded concave penalized estimation
Fan, J., Xue, L., & Zou, H. (2014) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/13-aos1198 · Cited by 313
Sun, Q., Zhou, W.-X., & Fan, J. (2020) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.2018.1543124 · Cited by 312
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, L., Wu, Y., & Li, R.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Statistical Association
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2012-03
- Volume
- 107
- Issue
- 497
- Pages
- 214-222
- ISSN
- 0162-1459 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-274X
- OpenAlex
- W2137620021
- Cited by
- 323
- References
- 34
- FWCI
- 10.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantile Regression for Analyzing Heterogeneity in Ultra-High Dimension. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/01621459.2012.656014
- The paper
- Wang, L., Wu, Y., & Li, R. (2012). Quantile Regression for Analyzing Heterogeneity in Ultra-High Dimension. Journal of the American Statistical Association. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.2012.656014
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.