Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 3,049

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Geophysical Research Letters

Open access
·2018·Geophysical Research Letters

Abstract

Choice of sea ice thermodynamics does not lead to large differences in sea ice state due to compensating thermodynamic changes Antarctic Bottom Water production increases by 0.5 Sv and upper ocean becomes denser due to increasing salinity with mushy thermodynamics Wintertime air-sea fluxes, atmospheric low-level mixing, and low cloud cover all decrease with mushy thermodynamics

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/(issn)1944-8007

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 8 references

Cited by

See all 3,049

Metadata

Venue
Geophysical Research Letters
Published
2018-04-02
ISSN
0094-8276 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4205617282
Cited by
3,049
References
8
Type
paratext
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Geophysical Research Letters. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/(issn)1944-8007
The paper
Geophysical Research Letters. (2018). Geophysical Research Letters. https://doi.org/10.1002/(issn)1944-8007

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.