Cited by 35Spatial and Panel Data AnalysisPoint processes and geometric inequalitiesGaussian Processes and Bayesian Inference

Valid Model-Free Spatial Prediction

Open access
Mao, Huiying, Martin, Ryan, Reich, Brian J.·2024·Journal of the American Statistical Association

Abstract

Predicting the response at an unobserved location is a fundamental problem in spatial statistics. Given the difficulty in modeling spatial dependence, especially in non-stationary cases, model-based prediction intervals are at risk of misspecification bias that can negatively affect their validity. Here we present a new approach for model-free nonparametric spatial prediction based on the conformal prediction machinery. Our key observation is that spatial data can be treated as exactly or approximately exchangeable in a wide range of settings. In particular, under an infill asymptotic regime, we prove that the response values are, in a certain sense, locally approximately exchangeable for a broad class of spatial processes, and we develop a local spatial conformal prediction algorithm that yields valid prediction intervals without strong model assumptions like stationarity. Numerical examples with both real and simulated data confirm that the proposed conformal prediction intervals are valid and generally more efficient than existing model-based procedures for large datasets across a range of non-stationary and non-Gaussian settings.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/01621459.2022.2147531

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • At worst, there is weak dependence such that conformal prediction inference is only asymptotically valid.

    “At worst, there is weak dependence such that conformal prediction inference is only asymptotically valid.”

    From Forecasting Extreme Temperatures in Siberia Using Supervised Learning and Conformal Prediction Regions (2025) · cites this paper as Mao et al., 2022

    The Introduction and Theorem 2 in ‘Theoretical validity of LSCP’ support asymptotic validity for local spatial conformal prediction at a fixed location under specified conditions. They do not characterize those conditions as ‘weak dependence.’ The paper also establishes finite-sample marginal validity for its global method when locations are randomly sampled, so ‘only asymptotically valid’ does not apply to its conformal methods generally. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 39 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Risser MD (2016). Nonstationary spatial modeling, with emphasis on process convolution and covariate–driven approaches. arXiv preprint arXiv:1610.02447. · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mao, H., Martin, R., & Reich, B. J.
Affiliations
  • Statistical and Applied Mathematical Sciences Institute (US)
  • North Carolina State University (US)
Corresponding author
Reich, Brian J.
Venue
Journal of the American Statistical Association
Published
2023-01-05
Volume
119
Issue
546
Pages
904-914
ISSN
  • 0162-1459 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-274X
OpenAlex
W4287750851
Cited by
28
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1
FWCI
3.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American Statistical Association (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • King Abdullah University of Science and Technology Repository (King Abdullah University of Science and Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (DMS–1638521, DMS–1811802, (R01ES031651, R01ES027892)
  • King Abdullah University of Science and Technology ((R01ES031651, R01ES027892, 3800.2)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Spatial and Panel Data Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Point processes and geometric inequalities
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Gaussian Processes and Bayesian Inference
Keywords
conformal prediction, prediction intervals, exchangeability, infill asymptotics, model misspecification, spatial statistics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review