Cited by 144Statistical Methods and InferenceAdvanced Causal Inference TechniquesGenetic Associations and Epidemiology

On the Use of the Lasso for Instrumental Variables Estimation with Some Invalid Instruments

Open access
Windmeijer, Frank, Farbmacher, Helmut, Davies, Neil, Davey Smith, George·2019·Journal of the American Statistical Association

Abstract

We investigate the behavior of the Lasso for selecting invalid instruments in linear instrumental variables models for estimating causal effects of exposures on outcomes, as proposed recently by Kang et al. Invalid instruments are such that they fail the exclusion restriction and enter the model as explanatory variables. We show that for this setup, the Lasso may not consistently select the invalid instruments if these are relatively strong. We propose a median estimator that is consistent when less than 50% of the instruments are invalid, and its consistency does not depend on the relative strength of the instruments, or their correlation structure. We show that this estimator can be used for adaptive Lasso estimation, with the resulting estimator having oracle properties. The methods are applied to a Mendelian randomization study to estimate the causal effect of body mass index (BMI) on diastolic blood pressure, using data on individuals from the UK Biobank, with 96 single nucleotide polymorphisms as potential instruments for BMI. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/01621459.2018.1498346

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent methods such as sisVIVE and adaptive LASSO provide MR estimates that are robust to pleiotropy under certain assumptions.

    “Recent methods such as sisVIVE71 and adaptive LASSO72 provide MR estimates that are robust to pleiotropy under certain assumptions.”

    From Mendelian randomization (2022) · cites this paper as [71]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 48 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Windmeijer, F., Farbmacher, H., Davies, N., & Davey Smith, G.
Affiliations
  • University of Bristol (GB)
  • Max Planck Society (DE)
  • MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, Bristol, United Kingdom
Corresponding author
Windmeijer, Frank
Venue
Journal of the American Statistical Association
Published
2018-11-13
Volume
114
Issue
527
Pages
1339-1350
ISSN
  • 0162-1459 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-274X
OpenAlex
W2900183310
Cited by
144
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2
FWCI
12.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American Statistical Association (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Econstor (Econstor) (submittedVersion)
  • mediaTUM (Technical University of Munich) (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (cc-by)
Funders
  • Fritz Thyssen Stiftung
  • Medical Research Council (MC_UU_12013, MCUU12013/1, MC_PC_17228, MC_UU_00011/1, MC_UU_00011, MC_UU_12013/9)
  • Economic and Social Research Council (ES/N000757/1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Inference
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
Keywords
LASSO, invalid instruments, instrumental variables, exclusion restriction, variable selection consistency, median estimator, adaptive LASSO, oracle property, Mendelian randomization, body mass index, diastolic blood pressure, single nucleotide polymorphisms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review