The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Soy Food Consumption and Risk of Prostate Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies
Open accessAbstract
Soybean products have been suggested to have a chemo preventive effect against prostate cancer. The aim of this study was to provide a comprehensive meta-analysis on the extent of the possible association between soy-based food consumption and the risk of prostate cancer. Five cohort studies and 8 case-control studies were identified using MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Korea Medical Database, KoreaMed, Korean studies Information Service System, Japana Centra Revuo Medicina, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and a manual search. Summary odds ratios (ORs) comparing high versus low categories of soybean consumptions were calculated on the basis of the random effect model. We analyzed the associations based on the different types of soybean consumptions. The summary ORs (95% CI) for total soy foods were 0.69 (CI = 0.57-0.84) and 0.75 (CI = 0.62-0.89) for nonfermented soy foods. Among individual soy foods, only tofu yielded a significant value of 0.73 (CI = 0.57-0.92). Consumption of soybean milk, miso, or natto did not significantly reduce the risk of prostate cancer. Genistein and daidzein were associated with a lower risk of prostate cancer. This systematic review suggests that soy food consumption could lower the risk of prostate cancer. This conclusion, however, should be interpreted with caution because various biases can affect the results of a meta-analysis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias
Begg, C. B., & Mazumdar, M. (1994) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2533446 · Cited by 16,955
Cited by
Soy and Health Update: Evaluation of the Clinical and Epidemiologic Literature
Messina, M. (2016) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu8120754 · Cited by 537
The potential health effects of dietary phytoestrogens
Rietjens, I. M. C. M., Louisse, J., & Beekmann, K. (2017) · British Journal of Pharmacology · doi:10.1111/bph.13622 · Cited by 490
Sharifi-Rad, J., Quispe, C., Imran, M., Rauf, A., Nadeem, M., Gondal, T. A., Ahmad, B., Atif, M., Mubarak, M. S., Sytar, O., et al. (2021) · Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity · doi:10.1155/2021/3268136 · Cited by 389
Fruit and vegetables and cancer risk
Key, T. J. (2011) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6606032 · Cited by 339
Risks and benefits of dietary isoflavones for cancer
Andres, S., Abraham, K., Appel, K. E., & Lampen, A. (2011) · Critical Reviews in Toxicology · doi:10.3109/10408444.2010.541900 · Cited by 168
Metadata
- Authors
- Hwang, Y. W., Kim, S. Y., Jee, S. H., Kim, Y. N., & Nam, C. M.
- Venue
- Nutrition and Cancer
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2009-09-23
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 598-606
- ISSN
- 0163-5581 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-7914
- OpenAlex
- W2109350491
- Cited by
- 234
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 1.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Soy Food Consumption and Risk of Prostate Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/01635580902825639
- The paper
- Hwang, Y. W., Kim, S. Y., Jee, S. H., Kim, Y. N., & Nam, C. M. (2009). Soy Food Consumption and Risk of Prostate Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies. Nutrition and Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1080/01635580902825639
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.