The Effect of a Home Delivery Meal Service of Energy- and Protein-Rich Meals on Quality of Life in Malnourished Outpatients Suffering from Lung Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Abstract
Undernutrition is prevalent in cancer patients and associated with increased incidence of complications and mortality. We investigated the effects of a home delivery meal service, providing a selection of energy-dense, protein-rich meals, on quality of life (QoL) in malnourished lung cancer patients. Forty lung cancer patients with nutritional risk score ≥3 (NRS-2002) were randomized to control or intervention. The intervention group was offered energy- and protein-rich main meals and snacks, delivered 3 times per week. The control group continued their habitual diet. Primary endpoint, QoL, and secondary endpoints were assessed at baseline, and after 6 and 12 wk. Data on unplanned readmissions, length of hospital stay, and mortality were collected 3 and 6 mo post-intervention. Intervention group improved standard Chair Stand Test (30-s CST) after 6 and 12 wk (P < 0.01) compared to control. Intervention exerted a significant positive effect on performance score after 12 wk (P = 0.047). Increased energy and protein intakes were strongly associated with improved QoL, functional score, hand grip strength, symptom and performance scores. Food delivery service with energy- and protein-rich main meals and snacks can improve lower body strength and performance status in malnourished lung cancer patients.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Eight studies investigate the effect of dietary enrichment.
“Eight studies investigate the effect of dietary enrichment [25-32].”
From ESPEN guideline on hospital nutrition (2021) · cites this paper as [31]
Oral nutritional interventions are effective at increasing nutritional intake and improving some aspects of quality of life in patients with cancer who are malnourished or at nutritional risk but do not appear to improve mortality.
“oral nutritional interventions are effective at increasing 469 nutritional intake and improving some aspects of quality of life in patients with cancer who are 470 malnourished or are at nutritional risk but do not appear to improve mortality [31].”
From ESPEN guideline on hospital nutrition (2021) · cites this paper as [31]
Cites
A 30-s chair-stand test as a measure of lower body strength in community-residing older adults.
Jones, C. J., Rikli, R. E., & Beam, W. C. (1999) · Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport · doi:10.1080/02701367.1999.10608028 · Cited by 2,921 · see citing works
Screening for emotional distress in cancer patients: a systematic review of assessment instruments
Vodermaier, A., Linden, W., & Siu, C. (2009) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/djp336 · Cited by 541 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
ESPEN guideline on hospital nutrition
Thibault, R., Abbasoglu, O., Ioannou, E., Meija, L., Ottens-Oussoren, K., Pichard, C., Rothenberg, E., Rubin, D., Siljamäki-Ojansuu, U., Vaillant, M.-F., et al. (2021) · Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2021.09.039 · Cited by 259 · see citing works
- Authors
- Leedo, E., Gade, J., Granov, S., Mellemgaard, A., Klausen, T. W., Rask, K., & Astrup, A.
- Affiliations
- Copenhagen University Hospital (DK)
- Herlev Hospital (DK)
- University of Copenhagen (DK)
- Corresponding author
- Astrup, Arne
- Venue
- Nutrition and Cancer
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2017-02-17
- Volume
- 69
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 444-453
- ISSN
- 0163-5581 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-7914
- OpenAlex
- W2588306553
- Cited by
- 47
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 2.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Nutrition and Cancer (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Region Hovedstaden
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
- Keywords
- lung cancer, malnutrition, quality of life, protein-rich meals, nutritional support, nutritional risk score, functional performance, grip strength, outpatients
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Body Weight, Diet, Dietary Proteins, Female, Food Services, Humans, Length of Stay, Lung Neoplasms, Male, Middle Aged, Outpatients, Quality of Life, Nutrition Assessment, Body Mass Index, Prevalence, Treatment Outcome, Hand Strength, Endpoint Determination, Malnutrition, Meals
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review