Cited by 117Developmental and Educational NeuropsychologyPsychological Testing and AssessmentNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Neuropsychological approaches to children: Towards a developmental neuropsychology

Fletcher, Jack M., Taylor, H. Gerry·1984·Journal of Clinical Neuropsychology

Abstract

Neuropsychologists working with children commonly infer a CNS basis for many developmental disabilities on the basis of test performance and behavioral observations. While there is nothing inherently wrong with such inferences, the fact that there exists no specific set of brain-behavior relationships validating these inferences is frequently overlooked. In this respect, CNS inferences on the basis of the child's performance can lead to four potential fallacies concerning relationships between brain and behavior. Each of these fallacies involves a failure to recognize important behavioral and biological differences between children and adults, or simply rests on faulty logic and inadequate research. In an effort to outline a truly developmental neuropsychology for children--as opposed to diverse approaches that apply adult-based techniques to children--we propose a functional organization approach. This approach separates the different types of variables underlying a developmental neuropsychology and focuses on behavioral theory and research addressing the development of children's abilities. A specific emphasis of this approach is on processes of change--one of the primary psychological characteristics separating children and adults. The use of this approach as a general research strategy for children whose disabilities are associated with demonstrable or presumed CNS aberrations may lead to a set of behavioral laws that can be systematically related to a biological substrate.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/01688638408401195

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Adult-derived executive function tests may be of little interest or relevance to children.

    “these tests may be of little interest or relevance to children”

    From Assessing Executive Function in Preschoolers (2012) · cites this paper as J. M. Fletcher & Taylor, 1984

  • The novelty factor and level of complexity of adult-derived tests are likely to be greater in children.

    “the novelty factor and level of complexity of such tests are likely to be greater in children”

    From Assessing Executive Function in Preschoolers (2012) · cites this paper as J. M. Fletcher & Taylor, 1984

  • There is a strong possibility that adult-derived tests tap different skills and neural networks in children or require greater cognitive resources.

    “there is a strong possibility that these tests tap different skills (and neural networks) in children or at least require greater cognitive resources”

    From Assessing Executive Function in Preschoolers (2012) · cites this paper as J. M. Fletcher & Taylor, 1984

  • Adult-derived tests often lack adequate normative data necessary to differentiate normal and abnormal performance within a developmental context.

    “they often lack adequate normative data necessary to differentiate normal and abnormal performance within a developmental context”

    From Assessing Executive Function in Preschoolers (2012) · cites this paper as J. M. Fletcher & Taylor, 1984

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fletcher, J. M., & Taylor, H. G.
Affiliations
  • Texas Research Institute (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
Venue
Journal of Clinical Neuropsychology
Published
1984-02
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
39-56
ISSN
0165-0475 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2068483958
Cited by
117
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
10.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
developmental neuropsychology, children, brain-behavior relationship, developmental disabilities, change processes, children versus adults, behavioral theory
MeSH terms
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Brain Damage, Chronic, Child, Diagnosis, Differential, Humans, Learning Disabilities, Intellectual Disability, Psychological Tests, Neurocognitive Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review