Neuropsychological approaches to children: Towards a developmental neuropsychology
Abstract
Neuropsychologists working with children commonly infer a CNS basis for many developmental disabilities on the basis of test performance and behavioral observations. While there is nothing inherently wrong with such inferences, the fact that there exists no specific set of brain-behavior relationships validating these inferences is frequently overlooked. In this respect, CNS inferences on the basis of the child's performance can lead to four potential fallacies concerning relationships between brain and behavior. Each of these fallacies involves a failure to recognize important behavioral and biological differences between children and adults, or simply rests on faulty logic and inadequate research. In an effort to outline a truly developmental neuropsychology for children--as opposed to diverse approaches that apply adult-based techniques to children--we propose a functional organization approach. This approach separates the different types of variables underlying a developmental neuropsychology and focuses on behavioral theory and research addressing the development of children's abilities. A specific emphasis of this approach is on processes of change--one of the primary psychological characteristics separating children and adults. The use of this approach as a general research strategy for children whose disabilities are associated with demonstrable or presumed CNS aberrations may lead to a set of behavioral laws that can be systematically related to a biological substrate.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Adult-derived executive function tests may be of little interest or relevance to children.
“these tests may be of little interest or relevance to children”
From Assessing Executive Function in Preschoolers (2012) · cites this paper as J. M. Fletcher & Taylor, 1984
The novelty factor and level of complexity of adult-derived tests are likely to be greater in children.
“the novelty factor and level of complexity of such tests are likely to be greater in children”
From Assessing Executive Function in Preschoolers (2012) · cites this paper as J. M. Fletcher & Taylor, 1984
There is a strong possibility that adult-derived tests tap different skills and neural networks in children or require greater cognitive resources.
“there is a strong possibility that these tests tap different skills (and neural networks) in children or at least require greater cognitive resources”
From Assessing Executive Function in Preschoolers (2012) · cites this paper as J. M. Fletcher & Taylor, 1984
Adult-derived tests often lack adequate normative data necessary to differentiate normal and abnormal performance within a developmental context.
“they often lack adequate normative data necessary to differentiate normal and abnormal performance within a developmental context”
From Assessing Executive Function in Preschoolers (2012) · cites this paper as J. M. Fletcher & Taylor, 1984
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Assessment and Development of Executive Function (EF) During Childhood
Anderson, P. (2002) · Child Neuropsychology · doi:10.1076/chin.8.2.71.8724 · Cited by 2,218 · see citing works
Developmental norms for the wisconsin card sorting test
Chelune, G. J., & Baer, R. A. (1986) · Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology · doi:10.1080/01688638608401314 · Cited by 467 · see citing works
Anderson, V. A., Anderson, P., Northam, E., Jacobs, R., & Mikiewicz, O. (2002) · Child Neuropsychology · doi:10.1076/chin.8.4.231.13509 · Cited by 338 · see citing works
Assessing Executive Function in Preschoolers
Anderson, P. J., & Reidy, N. (2012) · Neuropsychology Review · doi:10.1007/s11065-012-9220-3 · Cited by 293 · see citing works
- Authors
- Fletcher, J. M., & Taylor, H. G.
- Affiliations
- Texas Research Institute (US)
- University of Pittsburgh (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Neuropsychology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1984-02
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 39-56
- ISSN
- 0165-0475 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2068483958
- Cited by
- 117
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 10.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Keywords
- developmental neuropsychology, children, brain-behavior relationship, developmental disabilities, change processes, children versus adults, behavioral theory
- MeSH terms
- Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Brain Damage, Chronic, Child, Diagnosis, Differential, Humans, Learning Disabilities, Intellectual Disability, Psychological Tests, Neurocognitive Disorders
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review