Cited by 467Historical and Modern Theater StudiesNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesDevelopmental and Educational Neuropsychology

Developmental norms for the wisconsin card sorting test

Chelune, Gordon J., Baer, Ruth A.·1986·Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology

Abstract

While the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST) has been used widely among adult populations to evaluate the effects of frontal-lobe lesions, no comparable work has been done among younger populations due, in part, to the lack of an adequate normative base. This study presents developmental norms by age for the WCST for 105 school-age children. The data indicate that, by the time children are 10 years old, their performance on the WCST is indistinguishable from that of normal adults. Examination of the acquisition curves by age for Categories Achieved, Perseverative Errors, and Failures to Maintain Set reveals developmental changes that roughly correspond with neuroanatomical changes in the brain and cognitive stages of development. The present developmental norms are intended to complement and extend existing adult norms for the WCST and to facilitate the clinical use of the WCST as a neuropsychological test in child populations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/01688638608401314

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies of complex switching report inconsistent developmental trajectories, including a plateau at age 10 or 11-12, gradual improvement across the teenage years, or an inverted U in the teenage years.

    “with other studies suggesting a plateau at age 10 (Chelune and Baer, 1986; Chevalier et al., 2013; De Luca et al., 2003) or 11–12 (Huizinga et al., 2006; Huizinga and van der Molen, 2007; Somsen, 2007), gradual improvement across the teenage years (Crone et al., 2006; Crone et al., 2008), or an inverted U in the teenage years (van der Schaaf et al., 2011).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chelune, G. J., & Baer, R. A.
Affiliations
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • University of Mississippi Medical Center (US)
Venue
Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology
Published
1986-06
Volume
8
Issue
3
Pages
219-228
ISSN
  • 0165-0475 (ISSN-L)
  • 0168-8634
OpenAlex
W2021895097
Cited by
467
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 13
FWCI
5.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical and Modern Theater Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
Keywords
Wisconsin Card Sorting Test, developmental norms, elementary school students, frontal lobe, cognitive development, perseverative errors, set maintenance, neuropsychological assessment
MeSH terms
Attention, Brain Damage, Chronic, Child, Concept Formation, Discrimination Learning, Female, Humans, Intelligence, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Problem Solving, Psychometrics, Reference Values

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review