The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Wisconsin Card Sorting Test Performance as a Measure of Frontal Lobe Damage
Abstract
We examined the sensitivity and specificity of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST) as a measure of frontal lobe damage in 91 subjects with stable focal brain lesions. Anatomical information about the location and extent of brain damage was obtained from MR and CT transparencies. No significant differences in WCST performance were found between subjects with frontal vs. nonfrontal damage. Some subjects with extensive frontal lobe damage performed well on the WCST, and some subjects with damage outside of the frontal lobes failed. The optimal cutoff scores for discriminating frontal from nonfrontal subjects correctly classified only 62% of the subjects. Further analysis of WCST performances associated with damage to various subregions of the frontal lobes also failed to reveal any reliable relationships. These findings indicate that performance on the WCST cannot be interpreted in isolation as an index of frontal lobe damage.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Severe disturbance of higher cognition after bilateral frontal lobe ablation: Patient EVR
Eslinger, P. J., & Damasio, A. R. (1985) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.35.12.1731 · Cited by 1,426
Research works printed but not linked: 18
- Anderson S. W., 1990, Archives of Neurology, 47, 397, 10.1001/archneur.1990.00530040039017 · DOI
- Anderson S. W., 1988, Society for Neuroscience, 14, 1288
- 10.1080/00221309.1948.9918159 · DOI · Paper page
- Damasio A. R., 1985, Clinical Neuropsychology, 339
- Damasio H., 1989, Lesion analysis in neuropsychology
- 10.1016/S0010-9452(74)80006-7 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/h0059831 · DOI · Paper page
- Heaton R. K., 1981, Wisconsin Card Sorting Test Manual
- 10.1080/01688638608401321 · DOI
- 10.1001/archneur.1963.00460070100010 · DOI · Paper page
- Rosvold H. E., 1964, The frontal granular cortex and behavior, 332
- 10.1037/h0054430 · DOI
- Stuss D. T., 1986, The frontal lobes
- 10.1097/00005053-195111450-00006 · DOI
- Wechsler D., 1981, Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale ‐Revised
- 10.1037/h0055544 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1001/archpsyc.1986.01800020020004 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/h0056082 · DOI
Cited by
Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Emerson, M. J., Witzki, A. H., Howerter, A., & Wager, T. D. (2000) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1006/cogp.1999.0734 · Cited by 15,798
Executive functions and developmental psychopathology.
Pennington, B. F., & Ozonoff, S. (1996) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.1996.tb01380.x · Cited by 3,150
Kane, M. J., & Engle, R. W. (2002) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/bf03196323 · Cited by 2,229
The somatic marker hypothesis: A neural theory of economic decision
Bechara, A., & Damasio, A. R. (2005) · Games and Economic Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.geb.2004.06.010 · Cited by 1,986
Executive Function and the Frontal Lobes: A Meta-Analytic Review
Alvarez, J. A., & Emory, E. (2006) · Neuropsychology Review · doi:10.1007/s11065-006-9002-x · Cited by 1,981
Metadata
- Authors
- Anderson, S. W., Damasio, H., Jones, R. D., & Tranel, D.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1991-11
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 909-922
- ISSN
- 0165-0475 (ISSN-L)
- 0168-8634
- OpenAlex
- W2039861945
- Cited by
- 519
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 19.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
