The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Attentional deficits following closed-head injury
Abstract
Aimed to assess, in the light of current attentional theories, the nature of the attentional deficit in a group of severely traumatically head-injured subjects, relative to a group of orthopaedic rehabilitation patients, and to establish which neuropsychological measures best reflected the deficit. Three separate studies were conducted in order to meet these aims. The first study focused on selective attention; the second, on vigilance or sustained attention; the third, on the Supervisory Attentional System. Results provided no evidence for the presence of deficits of focused attention, sustained attention, or supervisory attentional control, but ample evidence for the presence of a deficit in speed of information processing. Those neuropsychological measures shown to be the best measures of this deficit included the Symbol Digit Modalities Test, simple and choice reaction-time tasks, colour naming and word reading scores on the Stroop, and the Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions
Stroop, J. R. (1935) · Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0054651 · Cited by 18,622
Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. Detection, search, and attention.
Schneider, W., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1977) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.1.1 · Cited by 5,902
Cited by
Manly, T., Anderson, V., Nimmo‐Smith, I., Turner, A., Watson, P., & Robertson, I. H. (2001) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/1469-7610.00806 · Cited by 693
A quantitative review of the effects of traumatic brain injury on cognitive functioning
Schretlen, D. J., & Shapiro, A. M. (2003) · International Review of Psychiatry · doi:10.1080/09540260310001606728 · Cited by 645
Manly, T., Owen, A. M., McAvinue, L., Datta, A., Lewis, G. H., Scott, S. K., Rorden, C., Pickard, J., & Robertson, I. H. (2003) · Neurocase · doi:10.1076/neur.9.4.340.15553 · Cited by 157
LEVINE, B., STUSS, D. T., MILBERG, W. P., ALEXANDER, M. P., SCHWARTZ, M., & MACDONALD, R. (1998) · Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society · doi:10.1017/s1355617798002471 · Cited by 145
BENNETT, P. C., ONG, B., & PONSFORD, J. (2005) · Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society · doi:10.1017/s1355617705050423 · Cited by 105
Self-citationChildren's Attentional Skills 2 Years Post-Traumatic Brain Injury
Catroppa, C., & Anderson, V. (2003) · Developmental Neuropsychology · doi:10.1207/s15326942dn2303_3 · Cited by 43
Samaan, Z., McDermid Vaz, S., Bawor, M., Potter, T. H., Eskandarian, S., & Loeb, M. (2016) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0158364 · Cited by 42
Metadata
- Authors
- Ponsford, J., & Kinsella, G.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1992-09
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 822-838
- ISSN
- 0165-0475 (ISSN-L)
- 0168-8634
- OpenAlex
- W2007905785
- Cited by
- 392
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 2.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
