The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Morphological and semantic effects in visual word recognition: A time-course study
Abstract
Some theories of visual word recognition postulate that there is a level of processing or representation at which morphemes are treated differently fromwhole words. Support for these theories has been derived frompriming experiments in which the recognition of a target word is facilitated by the prior presentation of a morphologically related prime (departure-DEPART). In English, such facilitation could be due to morphological relatedness, or to some combination of the orthographic and semantic relatedness characteristic of derivationally related words. We report two sets of visual priming experiments in which the morphological, semantic, and orthographic relationships between primes and targets are varied in three SOA conditions (43 ms, 72 ms, and 230 ms). Results showed that morphological structure plays a significant role in the early visual recognitionof English words that is independent of both semantic and orthographic relatedness. Findings are discussed in terms of current approaches to morphological processing.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains.
Plaut, D. C., McClelland, J. L., Seidenberg, M. S., & Patterson, K. (1996) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.103.1.56 · Cited by 2,698
Models of reading aloud: Dual-route and parallel-distributed-processing approaches.
Coltheart, M., Curtis, B., Atkins, P., & Haller, M. (1993) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037//0033-295x.100.4.589 · Cited by 1,798
Two routes or one in reading aloud? A connectionist dual-process model.
Zorzi, M., Houghton, G., & Butterworth, B. (1998) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance · doi:10.1037/0096-1523.24.4.1131 · Cited by 339
Cited by
Ending the reading wars: Reading acquisition from novice to expert
Castles, A., Rastle, K., & Nation, K. (2018) · Psychological Science in the Public Interest · doi:10.1177/1529100618772271 · Cited by 1,297
Self-citationLevels of processing during non-conscious perception: a critical review of visual masking
Kouider, S., & Dehaene, S. (2007) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2007.2093 · Cited by 835
The time course of visual word recognition as revealed by linear regression analysis of ERP data
Hauk, O., Davis, M. H., Ford, M., Pulvermüller, F., & Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (2006) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.11.048 · Cited by 586
Self-citationMorphological priming without morphological relationship
Longtin, C.-M., Segui, J., & Hallé, P. A. (2003) · Language and Cognitive Processes · doi:10.1080/01690960244000036 · Cited by 447
Morphological decomposition based on the analysis of orthography
Rastle, K., & Davis, M. H. (2008) · Language and Cognitive Processes · doi:10.1080/01690960802069730 · Cited by 384
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Rastle, K., Davis, M. H., Marslen-Wilson, W. D., & Tyler, L. K.
- Venue
- Language and Cognitive Processes
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2000-08
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 4-5
- Pages
- 507-537
- ISSN
- 0169-0965 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-0732
- OpenAlex
- W2146861208
- Cited by
- 529
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 31.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Morphological and semantic effects in visual word recognition: A time-course study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/01690960050119689
- The paper
- Rastle, K., Davis, M. H., Marslen-Wilson, W. D., & Tyler, L. K. (2000). Morphological and semantic effects in visual word recognition: A time-course study. Language and Cognitive Processes. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960050119689
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
