The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Letter position coding in printed word perception: Effects of repeated and transposed letters
Abstract
We report four experiments investigating the effects of repeated and transposed letters in orthographic processing. Orthographically related primes were formed by removing one letter from the target word, by transposing two adjacent letters, or by replacing two adjacent letters with different letters. Robust masked priming in a lexical decision task was found for primes formed by removing a single letter (e.g., mircle-MIRACLE), and this was not influenced by whether or not the prime contained a letter repetition (e.g., balace vs. balnce as a prime for BALANCE ). Target words containing a repeated letter tended to be harder to respond to than words without a letter repetition, but the nonwords formed by removing a repeated letter (e.g., BALNCE) were no harder to reject than nonwords formed by removing a non-repeated letter (e.g., MIRCLE, BALACE). Significant transposition priming effects were found for 7-letter words (e.g., sevrice-SERVICE), and these priming effects did not vary as a function of the position of the transposition (initial, final, or inner letter pair). Priming effects disappeared when primes were formed by replacing the two transposed letters with different letters (e.g., sedlice-SERVICE), and five-letter words only showed priming effects with inner letter transpositions (e.g., ponit-POINT). We present a revised “open-bigram” scheme for letter position coding that accounts for these data.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Now, one key empirical phenomenon provided the principal motivation for the theoretical shift from overly precise letter position coding schemes, such as the slot-coding scheme of the interactive-activation model (McClelland and Rumelhart, 1981), to more flexible coding schemes such as open-bigram coding. That was the effects of letter transpositions observed in masked priming experiments”
From A Dual-Route Approach to Orthographic Processing (2011) · cites this paper as Schoonbaert and Grainger, 2004
In the citing paper
“Empirical evidence in favor of this type of coarse orthographic coding has been obtained using the masked priming paradigm in the form of robust priming effects with transposed-letter primes (e.g., gadren-GARDEN: Perea and Lupker, 2004; Schoonbaert and Grainger, 2004), and subset and superset primes”
From A Dual-Route Approach to Orthographic Processing (2011) · cites this paper as Schoonbaert and Grainger, 2004
Citations
Cites
Context-sensitive coding, associative memory, and serial order in (speech) behavior.
Wickelgran, W. A. (1969) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0026823 · Cited by 376
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Dual-Route Approach to Orthographic Processing
Grainger, J., & Ziegler, J. C. (2011) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00054 · Cited by 459
Self-citationThe overlap model: A model of letter position coding.
Gomez, P., Ratcliff, R., & Perea, M. (2008) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/a0012667 · Cited by 405
Metadata
- Authors
- Schoonbaert, S., & Grainger, J.
- Affiliations
- a Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
- b CNRS and University of Provence, Aix-en-Provence, France
- Venue
- Language and Cognitive Processes
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2004-06
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 333-367
- ISSN
- 0169-0965
- 1464-0732
- Cited by
- 221
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review