The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Three languages, one ECHO: Cognate effects in trilingual word recognition
Abstract
Research on bilingual word recognition suggests that lexical access is non-selective with respect to language, i.e., that word representations of both languages become active during recognition. One piece of evidence is that bilinguals recognise cognates (words that are identical or similar in form and meaning in two languages) faster than non-cognates. The present study used cognates to investigate whether the non-selective access hypothesis holds also for trilinguals and three languages. Dutch-English-German trilinguals carried out a lexical decision task in their third language (German). The word materials included purely German control words, “double” cognates that overlapped in Dutch and German, but not in English, and “triple” cognates with the same form and meaning in Dutch, German, and English. Faster RTs were found for Dutch-German cognates than for control words, but additionally, “triple” cognates were processed even faster than “double” cognates. The “triple” cognate effect was not influenced by whether the participants had previously read an English text. A control experiment with German monolinguals confirmed that the effect was not an artifact of uncontrolled stimulus characteristics. Thus, independent of context, both the native language and another foreign non-target language influenced target language comprehension in trilinguals. This supports a view of language non-selective access implying all languages known to an individual may affect word activation and recognition.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The architecture of the bilingual word recognition system: From identification to decision
Dijkstra, T., & van Heuven, W. J. B. (2002) · Bilingualism: Language and Cognition · doi:10.1017/s1366728902003012 · Cited by 1,730
Self-citation
Cited by
Introducing LexTALE: A quick and valid Lexical Test for Advanced Learners of English
Lemhöfer, K., & Broersma, M. (2012) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-011-0146-0 · Cited by 1,338
Duyck, W., Van Assche, E., Drieghe, D., & Hartsuiker, R. J. (2007) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.33.4.663 · Cited by 355
Language comprehension in the bilingual brain: fMRI and ERP support for psycholinguistic models
van Heuven, W. J. B., & Dijkstra, T. (2010) · Brain Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.brainresrev.2010.03.002 · Cited by 271
Self-citationPoarch, G. J., & van Hell, J. G. (2012) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2011.09.008 · Cited by 137
The size and depth of vocabulary knowledge of Korean high school students in China
The Korean Society of Bilingualism, & Choi, J. (2018) · The Korean Society of Bilingualism · doi:10.17296/korbil.2018..73.395
Metadata
- Authors
- Lemho¨fer, K., Dijkstra, T., & Michel, M.
- Venue
- Language and Cognitive Processes
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2004-10
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 585-611
- ISSN
- 0169-0965 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-0732
- OpenAlex
- W2051324253
- Cited by
- 283
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Three languages, one ECHO: Cognate effects in trilingual word recognition. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/01690960444000007
- The paper
- Lemho¨fer, K., Dijkstra, T., & Michel, M. (2004). Three languages, one ECHO: Cognate effects in trilingual word recognition. Language and Cognitive Processes. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960444000007
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.