CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 174Neurobiology of Language and BilingualismLanguage Development and DisordersAging and Gerontology Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 130 of the 131 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Age-related effects on speech production: A review

Open access
Mortensen, Linda, Meyer, Antje S., Humphreys, Glyn W.·2006·Language and Cognitive Processes
DOI 10.1080/01690960444000278
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

In discourse, older adults tend to be more verbose and more disfluent than young adults, especially when the task is difficult and when it places few constraints on the content of the utterance. This may be due to (a) language-specific deficits in planning the content and syntactic structure of utterances or in selecting and retrieving words from the mental lexicon, (b) a general deficit in inhibiting irrelevant information, or (c) the selection of a specific speech style. The possibility that older adults have a deficit in lexical retrieval is supported by the results of picture naming studies, in which older adults have been found to name objects less accurately and more slowly than young adults, and by the results of definition naming studies, in which older adults have been found to experience more tip-of-the-tongue (TOT) states than young adults. The available evidence suggests that these age differences are largely due to weakening of the connections linking word lemmas to phonological word forms, though adults above 70 years of age may have an additional deficit in lemma selection.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/01690960444000278

Cites

130 of 130 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 131 references

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. Arbuckle T. Y., 2000, Psychology and Aging, 15, 65, 10.1037/0882-7974.15.1.65 · DOI
  2. Bowles N. L., 1994, Psychology and Aging, 9, 414, 10.1037/0882-7974.9.3.414 · DOI
  3. Burke D. M., 1987, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13, 79, 10.1037/0096-1523.13.1.79 · DOI
  4. Chae , B. C. , Burke , D. & Ketron , P.P. ( April , 2002 ). Aging and picture naming: The role of phonological retrieval . Poster presented at the Cognitive Aging Conference, Atlanta .
  5. Cohen G., 1993, Memory for proper names, 249
  6. Damian M. F., 1999, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 345, 10.1037/0278-7393.25.2.345 · DOI
  7. Dell G. S., 1986, Psychological Review, 93, 283, 10.1037/0033-295X.93.3.283 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Heine M. K., 1999, Psychology and Aging, 14, 445, 10.1037/0882-7974.14.3.445 · DOI
  9. James L. E., 2000, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 1378, 10.1037/0278-7393.26.6.1378 · DOI
  10. Kramer A. F., 1999, Psychology and Aging, 14, 99, 10.1037/0882-7974.14.1.99 · DOI
  11. Laver G. D., 1993, Psychology and Aging, 8, 34, 10.1037/0882-7974.8.1.34 · DOI
  12. Le Dorze G., 1992, Journal of Speech and Language Pathology and Audiology, 16, 21
  13. Madden D. J., 1988, Psychology and Aging, 3, 167, 10.1037/0882-7974.3.2.167 · DOI
  14. Madden D. J., 1993, Psychology and Aging, 8, 490, 10.1037/0882-7974.8.4.490 · DOI
  15. Miozzo M., 1997, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 1410, 10.1037/0278-7393.23.6.1410 · DOI
  16. Mitchell D. B., 1989, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 15, 31, 10.1037/0278-7393.15.1.31 · DOI
  17. Myerson J., 1992, Psychology and Aging, 7, 257, 10.1037/0882-7974.7.2.257 · DOI
  18. Myerson J., 1993, Adult information processing: Limits on loss, 115
  19. Paul S. T., 1996, Psychology and Aging, 11, 10, 10.1037/0882-7974.11.1.10 · DOI
  20. Pushkar D., 2000, Psychology and Aging, 15, 361, 10.1037/0882-7974.15.2.361 · DOI
  21. Randolph C., 1999, Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 14, 489, 10.1093/arclin/14.6.489 · DOI
  22. Sheriberg , E. ( 1996 ). Disfluencies in Switchboard . In Proceedings, International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP '96), Vol. Addendum, 11–14. Philadelphia, PA, 3–6 October .
  23. Taylor J. K., 2002, Psychology and Aging, 17, 662, 10.1037/0882-7974.17.4.662 · DOI
  24. Zacks R. T., 1994, Inhibitory mechanisms in attention, memory, and language, 241

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–174 of 174

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Mortensen, L., Meyer, A. S., & Humphreys, G. W.
Affiliations
University of Birmingham (GB)
ORCID
Meyer, Antje S.
Venue
Language and Cognitive Processes
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2006-01
Volume
21
Issue
1-3
Pages
238-290
ISSN
  • 0169-0965 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-0732
DOI
10.1080/01690960444000278
OpenAlex
W2088943238
Cited by
170
References
131
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 10
FWCI
0.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Language and Cognitive Processes (publishedVersion)
  • Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
Keywords
aging, speech production, older adults, disfluency, verbosity, word retrieval, picture naming, tip-of-the-tongue, inhibitory control, speech style, utterance planning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review