The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Auditory and Visual Semantic Priming in Lexical Decision: A Comparison Using Event-related Brain Potentials
Abstract
This study compared and contrasted semantic priming in the visual and auditory modalities using event-related brain potentials (ERPs) and behavioural measures (errors and reaction time). Subjects participated in two runs (one visual, one auditory) of a lexical decision task where stimuli were word pairs consisting of “prime” words followed by equal numbers of words semantically related to the primes, words unrelated to the primes, pseudo-words, and nonwords. Subjects made slower responses, made more errors, and their ERPs had larger negative components (N400) to unrelated words than to related words in both modalities. However, the ERP priming effect began earlier, was larger in size, and lasted longer in the auditory modality than in the visual modality. In addition, the lateral distribution of N400 over the scalp differed in the two modalities. It is suggested that there may be overlap in the priming processes that occur in each modality but that these processes are not identical. The results also demonstrated that the N400 component may be specifically responsive to language or potential language events.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing.
Collins, A. M., & Loftus, E. F. (1975) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.82.6.407 · Cited by 8,141
On the time relations of mental processes: An examination of systems of processes in cascade.
McClelland, J. L. (1979) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.86.4.287 · Cited by 1,298
Cited by
The brain basis of language processing: from structure to function.
Friederici, A. D. (2011) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00006.2011 · Cited by 2,140
Event-related brain potentials elicited by syntactic anomaly
Osterhout, L., & Holcomb, P. J. (1992) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/0749-596x(92)90039-z · Cited by 1,856
Self-citationBrain mechanisms linking language and action
Pulvermüller, F. (2005) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1706 · Cited by 1,828
Pulvermüller, F. (1999) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x9900182x · Cited by 1,284
Duncan, C. C., Barry, R. J., Connolly, J. F., Fischer, C., Michie, P. T., Näätänen, R., Polich, J., Reinvang, I., & Van Petten, C. (2009) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2009.07.045 · Cited by 1,191
Metadata
- Authors
- Holcomb, P. J., & Neville, H. J.
- Venue
- Language and Cognitive Processes
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1990-10
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 281-312
- ISSN
- 0169-0965 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-0732
- OpenAlex
- W2084229194
- Cited by
- 654
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 4.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Auditory and Visual Semantic Priming in Lexical Decision: A Comparison Using Event-related Brain Potentials. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/01690969008407065
- The paper
- Holcomb, P. J., & Neville, H. J. (1990). Auditory and Visual Semantic Priming in Lexical Decision: A Comparison Using Event-related Brain Potentials. Language and Cognitive Processes. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690969008407065
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.