The DOI matches its Crossref record; 66 of the 66 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Centering attention in discourse
Abstract
Centering is a set of processes by which people can coordinate their attention during conversation. Speakers signal where their attention is via particular lexical, syntactic and prosodic choices. These choices make discourse entities salient to addressees and may also signal whether speakers expect addressees' attention to be already centered on the same entities. Two questions arise: What linguistic devices do speakers use to make an entity salient in a discourse? And how do speakers re-refer to discourse entities that move in and out of the center of attention? I manipulated speakers' center of attention using a videotaped basketball game. Speakers tended to refer to prominent entities as sentence subjects. When they referred to entities as sentence objects, they were more likely to re-refer next by repeating the full noun phrase verbatim rather than pronominalising. This happened even though both a recency-of-mention strategy and world knowledge would have provided enough information to uniquely identify the referent of a pronoun. When speakers pronominalised entities that had not been centered syntactically, they tended to make them salient prosodically by lengthening the duration of those pronouns.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (2014) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315836010 · Cited by 6,082
Toward a model of text comprehension and production.
Kintsch, W., & van Dijk, T. A. (1978) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.85.5.363 · Cited by 5,298
Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983) · Cited by 5,190
Speaking: from intention to articulation
(1989) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.27-1947 · Cited by 5,003
Speaking: From Intention to Articulation
Levelt, W. J. M. (1989) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/6393.001.0001 · Cited by 4,804
Speaking. From Intention to Articulation
Caplan, D. (1990) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/0166-2236(90)90151-y · Cited by 4,008
Phonology and Syntax: The Relation between Sound and Structure
Selkirk, E. O. (1984) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 3,374
Conceptual Structures: Information Processing in Mind and Machine
Sowa, J. F. (1983) · Virtual Defense Library (Ministerio de Defensa) · Cited by 2,735
Attention, intentions, and the structure of discourse
Grosz, B. J., & Sidner, C. L. (1986) · doi:10.5555/12457.12458 · Cited by 2,580
Cognitive Status and the Form of Referring Expressions in Discourse
Gundel, J. K., Hedberg, N., & Zacharski, R. (1993) · Language · doi:10.2307/416535 · Cited by 2,000
Cited by
Experimental and theoretical advances in prosody: A review
Wagner, M., & Watson, D. G. (2010) · Language and Cognitive Processes · doi:10.1080/01690961003589492 · Cited by 425
Making Syntax of Sense: Number Agreement in Sentence Production.
Eberhard, K. M., Cutting, J. C., & Bock, K. (2005) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.112.3.531 · Cited by 384
The effect of additional characters on choice of referring expression: Everyone counts☆
Arnold, J. E., & Griffin, Z. M. (2007) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2006.09.007 · Cited by 268
Brown‐Schmidt, S., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2008) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1080/03640210802066816 · Cited by 231
The Old and Thee, uh, New: Disfluency and Reference Resolution
Arnold, J. E., Tanenhaus, M. K., Altmann, R. J., & Fagnano, M. (2004) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00723.x · Cited by 176
Metadata
- Authors
- Brennan, S. E.
- Venue
- Language and Cognitive Processes
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1995-05
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 137-167
- ISSN
- 0169-0965 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-0732
- OpenAlex
- W2075806525
- Cited by
- 261
- References
- 66
- FWCI
- 40.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Centering attention in discourse. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/01690969508407091
- The paper
- Brennan, S. E. (1995). Centering attention in discourse. Language and Cognitive Processes. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690969508407091
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.