Cited by 176Neurobiology of Language and BilingualismPhonetics and Phonology ResearchLanguage Development and Disorders

The Old and Thee, uh, New: Disfluency and Reference Resolution

Arnold, Jennifer E., Tanenhaus, Michael K., Altmann, Rebecca J., Fagnano, Maria·2004·Psychological Science

Abstract

Most research on the rapid mental processes of online language processing has been limited to the study of idealized, fluent utterances. Yet speakers are often disfluent, for example, saying “thee, uh, candle” instead of “the candle.” By monitoring listeners' eye movements to objects in a display, we demonstrated that the fluency of an article (“thee uh” vs. “the”) affects how listeners interpret the following noun. With a fluent article, listeners were biased toward an object that had been mentioned previously, but with a disfluent article, they were biased toward an object that had not been mentioned. These biases were apparent as early as lexical information became available, showing that disfluency affects the basic processes of decoding linguistic input.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00723.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Conversational speech is riddled with disfluencies, i.e. silent and filled pauses, repetitions, errors and repairs.

    “In fact, conversational speech is riddled with disfluencies, i.e. silent and filled pause, repetitions, errors and repairs”

    From Timing in Conversation (2023) · cites this paper as Arnold et al., 2004

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Arnold, J. E., Tanenhaus, M. K., Altmann, R. J., & Fagnano, M.
Affiliations
University of Rochester (US)
Venue
Psychological Science
Published
2004-09
Volume
15
Issue
9
Pages
578-582
ISSN
  • 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9280
OpenAlex
W2097914860
Cited by
176
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 9
FWCI
1.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD 27206, R01HD041522, HD-41522, R01HD027206)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
Keywords
disfluency, eye movements, object recognition, lexical access, sentence comprehension, rapid serial visual presentation
MeSH terms
Eye Movements, Humans, Time Factors, Verbal Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review