Cited by 41Public Policy and Administration ResearchJob Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorPublic Administration and Political Analysis

Only If We Agree? How Value Conflicts Moderate the Relationship Between Transformational Leadership and Public Service Motivation

Krogsgaard, Julie Alsøe, Thomsen, Pernille, Andersen, Lotte Bøgh·2014·International Journal of Public Administration

Abstract

Existing studies find positive associations between transformational leadership and public service motivation (PSM), but value conflict may moderate the relationship. This is investigated for Danish University Colleges using a mixed-methods design. These colleges educate future teachers, pedagogues, nurses, and social workers, and their strong public service-oriented missions and potentially conflicting public values make this sector a well-suited case to test whether consensus on public values is a precondition for a positive association between transformational leadership and employee PSM. Based on a survey of 968 employees combined with qualitative interviews concerning specific public values, we find that the less value conflict, the stronger the positive relationship between the direct managers’ level of transformational leadership and the employees’ PSM. This is also the case for the top management. This implies that transformational leadership might be a way for managers to enhance employee PSM, but only if there is no severe value conflict.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/01900692.2014.928315

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Quantitative studies indicate that transformational leadership increases employees' level of public service motivation.

    “As expected, quantitative studies (Wright, Moynihan, and Pandey 2012; Krogsgaard, Thomsen, and Andersen 2014, Bellé 2014; Park and Rainey 2008; Vandenabeele 2014) indicate that transformational leadership increases employees' level of PSM.”

    From Leadership and motivation: a qualitative study of transformational leadership and public service motivation (2018) · cites this paper as Krogsgaard, Thomsen, and Andersen 2014

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Krogsgaard, J. A., Thomsen, P., & Andersen, L. B.
Affiliations
  • Danish Ministry of Social Affairs, Children and Integration, Copenhagen, Denmark
  • Danish Agency for Digitisation, Copenhagen, Denmark
  • Aarhus University (DK)
Corresponding author
Andersen, Lotte Bøgh
Venue
International Journal of Public Administration
Published
2014-09-25
Volume
37
Issue
12
Pages
895-907
ISSN
  • 0190-0692 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-4265
OpenAlex
W1980740103
Cited by
41
References
2
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2
FWCI
11.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Public Administration (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Public Administration › Public Policy and Administration Research
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Public Administration and Political Analysis
Keywords
transformational leadership, public service motivation, value conflicts, moderation, public value, university employees, top management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review